She obviously did something wrong, but going by the law, she had to have conscious intent here, she had to "commit a conscious or intentional act in connection with the handling or use of a firearm that creates a substantial and unjustifiable risk that she is aware of" for the first charge, and that she "consciously took a chance of causing death or great bodily harm" for the second. But that's not what happened here.
Involuntary manslaughter involves knowing doing something risky, she didn't do that.
But the jury did not agree with me.