GoneGoldfishin'
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2018
- Messages
- 1,174
- Reaction score
- 11,386
I hope she is acquitted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why? She pulled her GUN instead of her taser and killed him. Clear negligence.I hope she is acquitted.
I hope she is not. MOOI hope she is acquitted.
This new body cam ….
Officer Lucky IMO was ready to cut Daunte some slack . He even said back in his patrol car something like - I think he’s telling the truth.
IMO KP should of not said
-there’s a warrant out for you-
until officer Lucky had Daunte cuffed.
I guess KP was in higher “training mode”
could of dialed it back …
cause look what SHE DID.
MOO
Probably because they think they are going to be shot and with good reason.I'm wrong more than not, but I think officers must tell you are under arrest prior to handcuffing a person. I've seen many cases here and locally, once they say you are under arrest...BAM the person resist.
Moo...
Well Day One is over...
Summary..I didn't see anything beyond the beginning of the cross of the mother, anyone care to tell me what I missed?
I don't see that happening. It would be very foolish for the prosecution to do so.I was just listening to some legal talk elsewhere which suggested the prosecution intends to pursue Blakely factors if Potter is found guilty. They based this on the fact the prosecution offered a great deal of (cumulative) testimony/evidence regarding the car crashes that were caused after Wright was shot. I don't know if this is true but it makes sense from a legal standpoint.
For anyone else (like me) who didn't know about Blakely factors...
Prosecutors will sometimes refer to “Blakely factors" or a “Blakely motion" in a criminal case. This means they intend to pursue a sentence longer than what the state law suggests.
Sentencing Guidelines Under Blakely v. Washington.
I don't see that happening. It would be very foolish for the prosecution to do so.
I don't see that happening. It would be very foolish for the prosecution to do so.
A stream of police officers and emergency medical workers followed her to the stand for much of the day, eventually prompting Potter attorney Paul Engh to seek a mistrial on the grounds that the state was presenting evidence irrelevant to her guilt or innocence, and instead was showing evidence consisting of “sordid pictures and prejudicial impact.”
Prosecutor Matthew Frank pointed out that the state is seeking an aggravated sentence for Potter if she’s convicted, and to do so must show the wider impact of her actions. Judge Regina Chu quickly dismissed the motion, though she did tell prosecutors to avoid showing the jury duplicate autopsy pictures.
Oh... I thought that's why the after-effects of the shooting were covered so thoroughly yesterday. Obviously, didn't realize that would be foolish... lol! Thank you for your legal input! I love learning the why's and why not's
I see that now also. That just makes no sense to me. I think she is pretty heavily charged as is, so to also seek enhancement is just over-kill in my opinion. But this being handled by the AG's office I believe and not the local DA's office.You are correct about the Blakely thing. I heard the prosecutor say so. Also heard court tv discuss it. It seems the state just wants to hammer this woman for making a terrible mistake. I don't get it. I hope she will not have to go to prison, after spending a quarter century in service to her community. imo
An investigator who collected evidence from former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter said in court Monday that Potter did not test her Taser in accordance with department policy on the day she fatally shot Daunte Wright.