Cool Cats
I EXPECT DOUGHNUTS
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
- Messages
- 12,467
- Reaction score
- 96,306
Well I am trying hard to be more open minded and of course respect differing opinions and try to understand where a different viewpoint is coming from. I am a work in progress.MOO, but if you watch the whole documentary, it reveals so much more support that was not allowed to be shown to the jury. The restraint technique, Floyd's past arrest footage for another incident where he swallows pills and reacts pretty much the exact same way he did when he died. The jury should have been shown the WHOLE footage from Floyd's arrest, from the first interaction with him.
I am sickened by the way Arrondondo lied under oath, and the evidence the judge would not allow to be presented. Shameful. And if you watch the footage of rioting and listen to the police officers who were there, they just let the 3rd precinct be overrun. The whole event was a tragedy all the way around. And Mpls still has not recovered.
That being said I think it would be a good idea for me to closely study the documentary and list the points the documentary is pushing.
To get an exact list point by point of what was actually missing that the jury really should have seen. I think the entire point here is that there could have been reasonable doubt by the jury if they had seen some evidence that the judge didn't allow or for some reason wasn't presented by the defense. Why not? I would like to know.
I will find out what exactly this is. When I get a chance, a bit busy now with family and Christmas. In a couple days.
Maybe no ones interested anymore but I actually would really like to know if there really is anything to this documentary.
Last edited: