A criminal who knows the whereabouts of law enforcement at any given moment can use that information to their advantage. A person of average intelligence can understand this and use it to his advantage. A criminal who is able to listen to law enforcement radio transmissions, for example, could use information obtained from those transmissions to further their criminal activity, hide criminal activity or avoid detection, assist in a get-away, or gain investigative information. Small town, rural police may be especially susceptible to this, as their daily routines may not vary much from one day to the next. In this manner, the activities and locations of law enforcement officers become predictable to the criminal. Knowing these things, a concerned citizen might even be inspired to write to the local newspaper editor wondering “Will our local police vary their activities so you don’t know where they will be at any given time?”
Such tactics could be used by anyone, anywhere in the U.S, in the late 1980s. For example, first available from your local Radio Shack store on November 30, 1987, the Realistic PRO-27 portable police scanner was priced at only $49.95 (1988 Radio Shack catalog, page 96,
http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/catalogs/1988/). By 1988, Radio Shack’s police call radio guide for Minnesota had increased one dollar in price from $6.95 to $7.95. (Radio Shack Cat. No. 62-1045). Very simple to set up and use, anyone with even a small income could afford such a device if they really wanted one - just a trip to Crossroads Mall. Simple technology affordable even to a person of simple means.
View a 26-year-old Realistic Pro 38 (1987) portable police scanner still fully functional in 2013:
Realistic Pro 38 police scanner - YouTube
Despite several highly publicized abductions of boys in the decade preceding the Wetterling case (Etan Patz – May 25, 1979; Adam Walsh - July 27, 1981; Johnny Gosch – September 5, 1982; Eugene Wade Martin - August 12, 1984; Jacob Irwin Wetterling – October 22, 1989) local, state, and federal law enforcement authorities still did not fully understand who to look for by the time Jacob Wetterling was kidnapped. For example, the day after the Wetterling abduction occurred, Stearns County Sheriff Charlie Grafft helplessly remarked to the press “We have nothing to go on.” and “We just have no evidence.”
Serious empirical research (including detailed case studies) on the subject, no doubt fueled by public outrage over these and other high profile abductions, would not arrive until the early 1990s. Federal and state enactments and subsequent funding did eventually provide greater insight into the type of person who commits such acts.
If you expect to understand who abducted Jacob Wetterling, you must know who you are looking for (unlike law enforcement at the time of the abduction). Anything else is just guesswork and a waste of time, as evidenced by many, many years of postings in this thread on this web site.
Start here. Read this document in its entirety:
http://www.yellodyno.com/pdf/OJJDP_Child_Molesters_Who_Abduct Children.pdf
Then, after reading the entire document, ask yourself who, if anyone, are you familiar with in relation to the Wetterling case that most closely resembles what you have learned from reading this research, particularly the case studies?
Prov. 11:14