I guess I never assumed that fact that Jacob's footprints ended halfway up the drive and meaning that a vehicle was involved, but rather that was the point the perp lifted him and carried him to his desired destination.
The final link you posted made no reference to cadaverine and how it has applied to the search warrant. Repost the correct link please.
Cadaver dogs only identify cadaverine therefore, Dan's garage had objects in it which reeked of cadaverine. One of these objects was a cedar chest. (Scary!)
I guess I never assumed that fact that Jacob's footprints ended halfway up the drive and meaning that a vehicle was involved, but rather that was the point the perp lifted him and carried him to his desired destination.
I've followed this case from the beginning.
It should be noted that cadaver dogs are not 100% successful. And to say they "reeked of cadaverine" is noting that you have first hand experience in this particular case, as that has not been made public knowledge.
If they reeked and both Jacob's and DR's DNA has been submitted and tested, what is LE waiting for than?
One of the best examples of cadaver dogs demonstrating both a hit and a miss is in the case of Caylee Anthony. Dogs "hit" on the trunk but failed to find the body, though they'd combed the area where the body was ultimately located (and only found haphazardly by a utility worker)
It's not an exact science by any means. Many references (pro and con) can be found here
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/ev...state243-sw3d-30texapphouston-1-dist2007.html
And that's where Jacob's scent stopped as well. Police dogs tracked his scent to that location as well. If he was hiked onto DR's shoulders they would have followed it further.
The cadaver dogs used for Caylee were sadly not the FBI's highly trained dogs, but an Orange County deputy's cadaver dog with unknown training.
For Jacob's case, the FBI put TWO of THEIR expertly-trained dogs on an airplane and flew them to Minnesota. The FBI's dogs are trained with actual human cadaverine. If each dog had an accuracy rate of 98%, that's reduces random error to almost ZERO. This means that Dan's garage had items that reeked of human cadaverine.
Here is a study showing 98% accuracy for cadaver dogs.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...uth-behind-the-crimescene-canines-835047.html
If you don't like the 98% accuracy rate conditions, consider two of the FBI's cadaver dogs with a 94% accuracy rate. That also leaves extremely little random error. Dan's garage had items in it that reeked of cadaverine.You're grossly misstating the findings in this study.
The 98% pertains to a VERY specific set of conditions
"Several squares had been placed beneath a clothed corpse within three hours of death, when some organs and many cells of the human body are still functioning. Over the next month, the dogs did hundreds of trials in which they signalled the contaminated square with 98 per cent accuracy, falling to 94 per cent when the square had been in contact with the corpse for only two minutes. The research concluded that cadaver dogs were an "outstanding tool" for crime-scene investigation."
And that's where Jacob's scent stopped as well. Police dogs tracked his scent to that location as well. If he was hiked onto DR's shoulders they would have followed it further.
If you don't like the 98% accuracy rate conditions, consider two of the FBI's cadaver dogs with a 94% accuracy rate. That also leaves extremely little random error. Dan's garage had items in it that reeked of cadaverine.
Random thought hit me today while passing some joggers. I wonder what DR typically wore in 1989 for running clothes? Mens black nylon running tights by any chance?
Two of the FBI's cadaver dogs examined Dan's garage in 2010. LE removed and kept a cedar chest from that garage in 2010. Perhaps Dan grabbed Jacob and threw him into that cedar chest (which LE now has as evidence) and THAT'S why Jacob's footprints and scent disappeared on the driveway. Dan is a strong man. You can see him lifting HUGE logs on his FB page. He could easily carry a cedar chest with a child inside.
If you don't like the 98% accuracy rate conditions, consider two of the FBI's cadaver dogs with a 94% accuracy rate. That also leaves extremely little random error. Dan's garage had items in it that reeked of cadaverine.
I've read on multiple sites that the 94% accuracy is when the scent is REASONABLY fresh. 20 year old scents aren't reasonably fresh.
I was thinking the abductor was wearing black boots, I am not sure they would have been fashionable with running tights ;-) .
It's not about what I like- its about the facts of this study. 94% accuracy is within 1 month of coming into contact with a decaying corpse
In the case of Jacob, we're talking about 20 years! (presence of a human corpse unknown)
(and please note I'm saying this respectfully. I didn't know the bit about the local sheriff dogs being used in Caylee's case as opposed to the FBI's dogs. Do you happen to know why/when certain dogs of various degrees are used? Anyway, thanks- I learned smthg!
(...and because the dog and his owner (sheriff in FL) testified, the dog's training would be on the court's record- open to scrutiny and cross exinination)