MrT
"St. Ann Police Chief Bob Schrader"
That should answer your question
http://www.ksdk.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=160585
Also it's on youtube now , no advertisement like on the other site
thank you......for the link............since the internet, was not up and running as it is now for home use........was not someone she met online.........but, i do remember the teachers comment i believe it was a teacher whom said, angie told her she was going out to the country tomorrow....which was a friday, the 19 no school that day?.................she had to met, someone.......earlier, from the neighborhood perhaps....at least a day or two before that friday, she became missing, after getting off a schoolbus on the day before thursday........from what i read here, and other links she mayhad gotton in the persons vehicle, after getting off the bus, so they were waiting for her.........................perhaps the man did, does live in the country, and probalbly at the time, was a single man, living alone.........to make things easier for hiim to carry out his preplans...........no to clse to neighbors, more rural and quite, a close small town perhaps..............the sex registry system was not anything like it is today, but i wondered about parloees, whom had been released, back into the area after serving time, and being on probation.................back then they took fingerprints, and not DNA i believe but uncertain...........in 93, ...the perp, had probably visit her school, sat and watch, see wh9ich route the driver took......the time she was dropped off, and the environment at the time, to pick a place for her to met him afterwards, when getting off the bus, that was not so crowded or not to be noticed...............Im assuming, that those released, in the area, back in the area.............after there sentence, had there DNA taken, to compare with what they have now.......since then there were only fingerprints i assume?.......i wish there was a photo, available, to show that corner, and area back then, on the day it happened..........the uncle factor they mentioned, she mentioned.........would be a white person, around the age of the parents at the time......but more like 25 35.........seems to me, to check those with the prints on file, and ask for there DNA...........but, i know, they have prints, but have not been able to match with anyone in the systems?..........which would make one think, this person commited no crime that would warrent fingerprints?..........I just dont believe, that a person, whom had never been convicted of a crime, would make this kind, there first time to commit.............I dont believe it...........KEEP RUNNING THE PRINTS...........how can there be no record on file, to match?......as i said before, run them internationaly, ....what prints are these?, a finger, thumb, palm........maybe theres a problem, with the tape or slide they put the prints in beofore there run......re-do it again, on different machines..........update the machine, or find a more sensitve matching machine.........and i would still look at the records, of persons released from any mental institution, for a henous crime they committed as a teen perhaps, that got them sent to the institution......a teens record, wouldnot be released, or sealed......but they could find out whom was released, and what reason they did the time to begain with............................
I typed alot here just now, but i really, really want to help slove this case in anyway i can........and ill post anything, i feel may help, without regards to being wrong or right..........this one really bothers me to no end..........ill leave my personal feelings out of it..........
ALL JUST MOO.......NOTHING FACTUAL ALL SPECULATIONS ON MY PART.