scapa
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,624
- Reaction score
- 15,021
dr dona, So interesting. I'd like to read more of your opinion. "In freudian terms they have no superego" More about this please. And how you think it might apply to AB. Much thanks!!
The superego is installed in the wake of the Oedipal/Elektra trauma and serves to regulate and repress the subject's desires -- another way of putting it in Freudian terms is that the pleasure principle is replaced by the reality principle and the subject is consequently on her/his way to being a moral citizen.
If AB lacks a superego then she lacks the mechanism to control her desires and impulses and will tend to a) act on them and b) feel little shame or remorse for those actions. She may well "know" (by rote) that the action is wrong but will have no inhibition about undertaking it anyway. Freud viewed this as a pathology but thought it could be treated, at least in his early work.
I suspect that whatever treatment AB received was both less than intensive and, arguably, aimed at a child believed to be suffering from depression and not from conduct disorder. She seems very similar in psych profile to Jasmine Richardson, who arranged and aided in the murder of her parents and 8 year-old brother in Canada in 2005 (I think). She will be out in a few years despite, according to recent reports, having not fully responded to the treatment she has received while incarcerated.
I don't think, for the record, that AB should be ushered back onto the street and left to offend again. But I don't think that she is necessarily evil, monstrous, incorrigible or destined to murder again. She is fifteen and is not, neurologically speaking, an adult. That is scientific fact, not opinion (this is one of my professional areas of speciality).
Actually, although I share the sorrow and anger of most if not all in this thread about this crime and alleged criminal, I'm a bit bothered by the very idea of "trying as an adult." There are, as I've suggested, good reasons to think that young teenagers do not have adult competencies when it comes to things like impulse control, empathy, long-range planning, etc. Why should the scope of the crime itself determine how the criminal is tried? If we feel that child -relevant sentencing requires review, then we ought to rethink it, rather than fudge things by trying children as adults, when they aren't.
s