stilettos
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 5,832
- Reaction score
- 8
I agree with the fishing after I looked at the subpoena and saw that they aren't meeting until Oct. 18. I thought they were meeting sooner. Then at the bottom it says the subpoena may be satisfied by relenquishing said information to the server. Seems it is not definite her case will go before the gj.
My hopes just sank a bit.
http://media2.nbcactionnews.com/NWT/pdf/20111010_KSHBIrwinSubpoena_1.pdf
which means:
1)the GJ is hearing the case (and nbc says the prosecutor is involved)
2)so they just would open a case to the GJ and get a judge to sign off on the subpoena (along with the prosecutor who decides a case is worth persuing) to get some willy nilly news footage that they (investigators) most likely have seen already and compared to any hard copy statements given by the parents?
-----
probable cause... there had to be that to fit all of the above.
and who knows maybe they are searching news videos/interviews for someone lurking in the background???
but a family member has already made statements that there are gaps in the timeline and a failed poly..
who knows at this point but things being things.. a GJ being involved at this point along with the prosector.. well they have rules they follow.. so they have something we don't know....
:twocents::twocents::twocents:
1) The GJ not being in session until 10/18 tells me they are still fishing
2) The supoena being satisfied by relinquishing said info to the server...they are still adding up info.
Not before the GJ at this time.