MO - Sherrill Levitt, 47, Suzie Streeter, 19, & Stacy McCall, 18, Springfield, 7 June 1992 #13

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
ArkansasTimeTraveler said:
Again her story was straight. Reporting was inaccurate. They even say this in NL articles...
Click to expand...


Well I don’t believe it was and I fail to believe she was that utterly moronic that day.

I am allowed to believe what I wish to the same way some posters believe it’s bent cops. Then others believe it was the GR3 or Garrison.

we each have our pet theory’s and I believe she was somehow involved. I don’t believe she murdered them or knew what the people involved was going to do but she ruined the crime scene knowingly and played her part in getting Suzie to go home that night. She didn’t count on Stacey going with her though which threw a wrench in the plans.


IMO
MOO
 
Nadal said:
Mike, his wife, Cherrymeg, Scooby4u, Missouri Mule, all seem to have a similar amount of knowledge as you. Why aren't you interested in solving the case with them? Is it because they don't agree with you? Or...
Click to expand...
because i have reason to believe GRs linked the women to the abductors and I find mike and wife disingenuous........is that an issue ?

mule thinks monkeymann did it
Monkeymann thinks jk did it
Cherry meg was recruited by Mrs. Clay to echo their script....not interested...is that okay w/you?

round n round we go....not interested in suppositions and “MOO”s.... interested in hard facts n data
 
ArkansasTimeTraveler said:
because i have reason to believe GRs linked the women to the abductors and I find mike and wife disingenuous........is that an issue ?

mule thinks monkeymann did it
Monkeymann thinks jk did it

round n round we go....not interested in suppositions and “MOO”s.... interested in hard facts n data
Click to expand...

Every single post of yours is a MOO whether you want to add that or not, you don't have a clue what actually happened. This is the problem, you think you are right and that's all that's important to you which is what i said in the first place.
 
Nadal said:
Every single post of yours is a MOO whether you want to add that or not, you don't have a clue what actually happened. This is the problem, you think you are right and that's all that's important to you which is what i said in the first place.
Click to expand...


Well Said :)


Nobody on here knows what really happened or it would be solved.
 
Nadal said:
Every single post of yours is a MOO whether you want to add that or not, you don't have a clue what actually happened. This is the problem, you think you are right and that's all that's important to you which is what i said in the first place.
Click to expand...
actually I backed everything up...... And linked multiple violent criminals to the women that were strong enough to get a GJ hearing and info sealed by a judge....... I don’t play around with wild theories out of a hat...I look at facts and what we know.......no “suppose this” and “suppose that” nonsense

Because we don’t know what happened we’re supposed to respect outlandish theories ? No U don’t make the rules
 
ArkansasTimeTraveler said:
How do you know some don’t actually know and can’t prove it in court of law....yet
Click to expand...


Because they have just done a new tv special and it certainly didn’t sound solved.

I hope for the families sake it can still be solved but I just can not see it.
 
ArkansasTimeTraveler said:
actually I backed everything up...... And linked multiple violent criminals to the women that were strong enough to get a GJ hearing and info sealed by a judge....... I don’t play around with wild theories out of a hat...I look at facts and what we know.......no “suppose this” and “suppose that” nonsense

Because we don’t know what happened we’re supposed to respect outlandish theories ? No U don’t make the rules
Click to expand...

I never once said you are supposed to do anything, i said it would be nice if you didn't dominate the thread with the exact same posts.

Regardless of what you backed your opinion up with it's still an opinion, you understand this, right? I haven't posted ANY theories nevermind any out of a hat, you seem to have a default response and you're malfunctioning because none of them apply to me.

Which theories are outlandish? Lets discuss that with facts, i'm here for that.
 
For somebody who wants to stick to facts the cops found no links to drugs in any of their backgrounds :D
 
Okay, I’ll start with this even if it’s been discussed. I think Stacey was the target and I think Robert Cox was the “lone” perpetrator. Robert Cox worked with Staceys dad at his car dealership and I think the motive was sexual. Thoughts?
 
Sarah J. Scott said:
Okay, I’ll start with this even if it’s been discussed. I think Stacey was the target and I think Robert Cox was the “lone” perpetrator. Robert Cox worked with Staceys dad at his car dealership and I think the motive was sexual. Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Cox followed Stacy at high school parties and knew about her last minute change of sleep plans? Cox has a place to take bodies ? He was a loner with a poor family with a small war box 1940s house.....
 
asyousay said:
Show me links that say they had connections to drug gangs then please?
Click to expand...
Garrison sold drugs (it’s in his Case Net dockets) MC/DR are link between him and Suzie.... Garrison has a tattoo of a prominent biker gang known for pushing crank at Foxy’s and Crazy Horse.....

this is old info
 
Sarah J. Scott said:
Okay, I’ll start with this even if it’s been discussed. I think Stacey was the target and I think Robert Cox was the “lone” perpetrator. Robert Cox worked with Staceys dad at his car dealership and I think the motive was sexual. Thoughts?
Click to expand...


Why would he not take her when she was alone?

why risk kidnapping the other 2 women and bringing with it even greater risk of being caught?
 
asyousay said:
this never made the newspapers I’m assuming as I have not read anything on this?
Click to expand...
Garrison GJ3 was in KY3 and KOLR10 archive.org/Cronus news reports.... garrison mentioned in 1994 news articles about the digs and he’s the obvious “informant” Doug Thomas mentions as well.... his case net info is public on MISSOURI Courts site....... u should go read them if you want to truly investigate this case properly. Media articles don’t have answers for u
 
asyousay said:
Some of these posts are absolutely pathetic. By the sounds sounds of it you are all elderly and yet are behaving like children and you are deliberately derailing this thread.

for what purpose exactly?
Click to expand...
because its a giant cover-up theres these , (three missing women ) , in springfield but there were a dozen all in all that disappeared thru out the ozarks , they are afraid that a link will be found between these 3 women and any of the others , which will force the admission that these women were trafficked..and it.might happen at any minute
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 184 more.
Total: 444 (members: 185, guests: 259)

Online statistics

Members online
185
Guests online
259
Total visitors
444
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,656
Messages
18,243,129
Members
234,410
Latest member
DeChino
Back
Top