heartgoesout
Verified can just be typed in here.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 4,627
- Reaction score
- 8,345
I just don't see how someone could have done anything at the QT. There are camera everywhere and a police car right there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know some don't like the police corruption angle at all, and for me, it's just simply about the idea that I can't exclude it until there are explanations. I feel like I now have more questions for LE than I did before.
For example, this is now the first time we have heard that the officer followed Toni from the pump. This was not something we definitively knew before. I see people citing Occam's razor etc. But I'm just going to point to any number of police corruption cases. Did those individuals take a risk? People who think they can get away with it, take risks.
Instead of asking me about why or citing occam's razor, maybe just ask Daniel Holtzclaw :
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/21/us/oklahoma-city-officer-daniel-holtzclaw-rape-sentencing/
I could go further, not sure we can discuss this here, but all I'm gonna say is that my mind doesn't exclude someone until I actually see something that excludes them. I was bothered by the idea that "vetting" was the reason for exclusion and not actual footage that proves his whereabouts at the time of the last ping. Saying someone drove the other direction at whatever time is distinctly different than accounting for their time one hour later. It's not high probability, but I don't think it's implausible. But after that video, I think it's more probable than I was thinking before. why? Because they took a baby step to try and point away from it, not just flat out prove it. I have questions like - did he call in the pullover? Simple question, right? But if he did that, certainly there'd be information about if he ran the plate etc. right?
So... if he didn't call it in, or run the plate. Doesn't that tell us that he likely knew her? At that point does the probability go up or down regarding LE corruption? I personally think if this officer knew her well enough that he didn't call in her plates as they usually do, then you start to ask more questions. In this case, we were actually initially told there was no pullover and that's not something we should forget.
So using occam's razor before you have gotten the simplest of details seems to be an abuse of the ole razor imo.
Ditto. [emoji817] %. I have never bought into the LE involvement theory because of the Probability. I have a lot of questions about that stop as well MaxManning! Calling it in would be my 1st- also, unless there is something else on that dashcam footage of relevance they definitely should have/would have put it out there. Relevance to what yet I haven't decided on, but I'm with you MM Until it's evidentially cleared it is still probable. Why did he follow her after she got gas? That isn't that normal. Has anyone asked themselves "what if she were MEETING HIM?"
I must mention that my 1st theory is a combo of known persons from work and drugs. I am also seeing where that could potentially be putting her as a CI. I wouldn't normally be inclined to go that route, but the people involved are a lot of "young shady" and "old shady". Old connections and new ones. I think her car is hidden in a garage somewhere waiting till the dust settles. Any outbuildings, commercial real estate empty, real estate, home. Anyone she knows from work own any real estate out there? Not to mention that BS owns Wild to Mild, hangs out with DJ, and one of their sisters works at Shady Lady- Get any shadier?
I am going to look at all the evidence again when I get back home to my computer. In my mind now there could possibly be a theory I didn't take into consideration prior to the CrimeWatch daily video. Which, by the way, is no where to be found. Is that normal? I don't think so!
Jerrod- you said PS didn't make the call to PD on her missing. Who did? It was stated that PS called it in. Please tell! Thx
Just thinking out loud-
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The marks on his face are visible in some older pictures of him. I'm thinking birthmark or acne (or something similar) scars. I'll try to find a link to older pictures for reference.Did anyone ever prove those marks on BF face were old BTW?
Who called the missing person report in
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Secret lover motive? Well of course the oldest motive in the book... passion, jealousy, anger, jilted, etc...
An we have no confirmation on who this male coworker is LE spoke of in the video ?
Because a drug dealing boyfriend that has control of your social media accounts and you hide from your parents doesn't scream jealous boyfriend type. But a cute little face I guess can skew that.
Friends are quiet, just as the police have asked them to be along with the parents.
My friends would never go online to a sleazy social media page and tell the world about an affair I was having or all the drugs I did. Usually birds of a feather flock together and don't want their business all over the place.
We have no idea what the friends have told the police.
I've seen no connection to Parkville presented.
I've seen no connection to Parkville presented.