If she stopped at a party, it would seem as though someone would have come forward as a witness by now. Unless, it was a small party-a couple of friends who are the actual perpetrators.
Or she didn't go in, just picked someone up?
If she stopped at a party, it would seem as though someone would have come forward as a witness by now. Unless, it was a small party-a couple of friends who are the actual perpetrators.
Dont' mean to be argumentative....but does it really matter if she smoked??? alot of kids do stuff their families know nothing about....what matters is who tortured and murdered this precious young woman....................I have to agree with this. While the video isn't clear enough to be 100% certain, the back and forth motion of her hand sure looks like someone rubbing a cigarette out into the pavement and not a motion of someone picking up a penny.
Hey guys. I've been lurking, but needed to add my 2 cents.
-I was curious as to why DT was brought in for questioning (and was the only one named). If you run a Google search of his name, you will find a case with an identical name in it. The age is a few years off, and this person should still be incarcerated, but I also saw some appeals documents. Read the case. It is freakishly similar. Woman was hit on the head and set on fire after being followed into her house.
-Police might be saying street talk is quiet, so they don't put anyone in danger. No one has been arrested, so someone saw something in a remote area, and all of a sudden the police know about it, it would be easy for a criminal to know who 'snitched'.
-Another thing that keeps getting me is the clerk. The statements he made are odd to me. They weren't friends or anything, but she was a regular customer. Why would he say she'd tell him if something was wrong? I'm from a small town, and most places know me by name. I would never tell them about my personal life, though. Also..She usually puts $5 or so in her tank, but that day she put $14 in. I find it odd that he made sure to mention that he asked her why, and she said she's going somewhere. You'd think with that casual of a conversation about gas, his next question would have been 'oh where are you going?'. The more I think about it, the more I just wonder why someone would ask a customer why they're getting 'so much' gas.
-All news articles I've seen say that she entered the store, paid $14, received phone call, pumped gas, then re entered to buy cigarettes, and left. Why prepay for $14 of gas, unless that's the last of your money? Remember..she then re entered to buy cigarettes, so she had to have had more money. Was the person she talked to off camera someone who was under 18, and wanting her to buy them? Were there any calls made from inside the gas station around that time?
These are just thoughts running through my head. I tried to make sense of them, but you know how that goes... I'm not accusing anyone. They are just different avenues to look at.
I wonder why it happened here? In a hurry? Not familiar with the roads?
-Another thing that keeps getting me is the clerk. The statements he made are odd to me. They weren't friends or anything, but she was a regular customer. Why would he say she'd tell him if something was wrong? I'm from a small town, and most places know me by name. I would never tell them about my personal life, though. Also..She usually puts $5 or so in her tank, but that day she put $14 in. I find it odd that he made sure to mention that he asked her why, and she said she's going somewhere. You'd think with that casual of a conversation about gas, his next question would have been 'oh where are you going?'. The more I think about it, the more I just wonder why someone would ask a customer why they're getting 'so much' gas.
That was my original thought too @skiaboo but, her car was actually on opposite side of the road!
location of where JC's car was found on the map
![]()
Finding the monster who did this will require careful attention to little details like whether she smoked or not.Dont' mean to be argumentative....but does it really matter if she smoked??? alot of kids do stuff their families know nothing about....what matters is who tortured and murdered this precious young woman....................
Oh god grief :facepalm: I knew that, I knew that because of the green barrier vs the wooden fence at the other side! Thank you and so sorry, idk if little google man got turned around or it's me who is upside down lol!
Ok scratch my theory then. She had to be coming from the SW!!
Dont' mean to be argumentative....but does it really matter if she smoked??? alot of kids do stuff their families know nothing about....what matters is who tortured and murdered this precious young woman....................
I don' care if she smokes or not HOWEVER it is important to the case to figure out if she smoked or if she was buying them for someone else. Maybe a friend called and said pick up some cigs while u are at the store, and I will meet up with you?
So then, which direction was her car traveling to end up where her car did?
If she was traveling NE, then it makes more sense that she veered off to the right and up the embankment.
If she was traveling SW, then she would have had to do a 180!
Exactly!
Must have been this way
View attachment 65369
Screenshots from that direction SW (notice how the car was at the top of a small incline?)
View attachment 65370View attachment 65371View attachment 65372
Like you say if it was coming from the other direction (from the direction of Courtland) it would have had to do virtually a 180 degree spin, highly unlikely, unless it was hit by another car that spun it out, but that would leave a lot of debris, so I cannot see that happened.
View attachment 65373
Sorry for all the SS's Google Streetview link