Steleheart
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2013
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 3,310
First and foremost,this is my theory of the events. So please read my post as a theory of what could have happened. I welcome criticism this is a discussion of the crime. I am not privy to any of the actual evidence.
My Fox Memphis is the reference for the 'original' Champion Feb 17,2015 timeline which I refer to in my post.
The Clarion Ledger is the reference for the 'latest' Champion timeline of Feb 25th which I refer to in my post.
http://www.clarionledger.com/story/...e-call-in-jessica-chambers-timeline/23996469/
Referencing the hour 6:30 to 7:31:
According to Champion:Jessica called her mother** this was the last known communication made from Jessica.Investigators are not sure of the actual location where Jessica called & talked to her mother from.
I have always felt Champion was playing a game of chess with us & he was using that call** as a part of his strategy. OK,Champion on Feb 17th entirely omitted Lisa's conversation with Jessica. Then,in the latest version Feb 25th of the timeline he artfully puts it back in.Why does he initially ignore this critical detail on Feb 17th then decide on Feb 25th to include it? In addition on Feb 25th he tweaks Lisa's version with the caveat that it was Jessica who initiated the call** ? I think that is significant. I think he is playing cat and mouse with the narrative. But why?
John Champion said,"They could put Jessica on the scene where she was found at 7:31."
I think the significance is;Jessica initiated a call for help on her cell at 7:31 and it was interrupted. Who ever was there wrestled her cell away and threw it out of her reach.
I also think that at least one 'particular' person who was witness to a mortally burned Jessica was also involved in the events of the missing hour. I think that is why it is of particular importance to prove the whereabouts of all the perpetrators of this murder. I am saying that this 'particular' person would be part of a coverup or part of the actual crime. I do not know which? But,I do believe there is a coverup. (My opinion only)Tom Dees unfortunately chose not to pursue this story as an investigative journalist. The question is would any of us given the methodology practiced by the criminals operating in this place?
:cow:
I like this one Miz. Analytical and insightful as always.
So my 2 BBM's:
Why would Champion play Chess with us, are we important?
Playing cat and mouse with a particular narrative goes no where. playing "cat and mouse" with a person could be very, very productive. Perhaps he has a person he needs to get into a corner with. I also wonder if the people who were interviewed and taken in for questioning were done so publicly to show the real perp(s) that ruling out those people leaves no one else but YOU (notyoumizlol).
Waiting for a crack.
:cow: