suspicious1
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 3,762
- Reaction score
- 20
Are we able to discuss Mr. Young or Mr. McClenic?
Just asking
Just asking
1) I am curious how that call from high ranking gang member to BC went. As in how did high ranking gang member introduce himself, as high ranking gang member? or does BC already know this alleged high ranking gang member? Did high ranking gang member have to look BC up in the phone book or was he already in gang member's contacts list/phone?
2) Given how many people are using the dog reference in describing what was done to Jessica and how they wouldn't even do that to a dog, I would hate to be a dog in Panola. Just sayin.
I feel bad saying this but Mr. Chambers really should kinda keep quiet. I know it must be very difficult for him but there is already way too much misinformation out there.
Just Really happy FBI upped reward and some jail house snitch might go for it. Even if they aren't greatest witness during a trial sometimes they're the person that starts things going in right direction.
Also, if you're not on twitter, you might try it or at least tweet once a day regarding Jessica Chambers. I block all the horrible people, the rest tweeting for her seem like they truly care and are keeping her "relevent" for lack of a better word.
1) I am curious how that call from high ranking gang member to BC went. As in how did high ranking gang member introduce himself, as high ranking gang member? or does BC already know this alleged high ranking gang member? Did high ranking gang member have to look BC up in the phone book or was he already in gang member's contacts list/phone?
2) Given how many people are using the dog reference in describing what was done to Jessica and how they wouldn't even do that to a dog, I would hate to be a dog in Panola. Just sayin.
bbmI find it far too coincidental that BC said doctors told the family and AA has said LE told him about the accelerant. That's two different sources providing very similar information.
JMO
No. I loved your post about your husband, though.Are we able to discuss Mr. Young or Mr. McClenic?
Just asking
I've got my husband addicted to this case now..
Makes for great discussion but my husband is stuck on the gas can man.
He is convinced that the gas can man is involved in some way and he will not back down from that.
No matter what I say....his response is "oookkk...but the gas can man set that car on fire or gave that gas can to someone else who set that car on fire. Either way HE'S INVOLVED."
Needless to say he's not hearing anything else if it does not involve the gas can man.
No. I loved your post about your husband, though.![]()
I've got my husband addicted to this case now..
Makes for great discussion but my husband is stuck on the gas can man.
He is convinced that the gas can man is involved in some way and he will not back down from that.
No matter what I say....his response is "oookkk...but the gas can man set that car on fire or gave that gas can to someone else who set that car on fire. Either way HE'S INVOLVED."
Needless to say he's not hearing anything else if it does not involve the gas can man.
Although LE claims to have "cleared GasCanMan and CigBummer", one would imagine that the Alphabet Boys still have them on their radar screen -- unless the accelerant used was definitely identified by now as a gasoline formula not from the M&M Gas Mart.
CigBummer on the other hand has some interesting baggage which we here at WS can not discuss.
I've got my husband addicted to this case now..
Makes for great discussion but my husband is stuck on the gas can man.
He is convinced that the gas can man is involved in some way and he will not back down from that.
No matter what I say....his response is "oookkk...but the gas can man set that car on fire or gave that gas can to someone else who set that car on fire. Either way HE'S INVOLVED."
Needless to say he's not hearing anything else if it does not involve the gas can man.
Apparently the Panolian is out for the week. Does anyone have a subscription so we can verify why M and W were arrested?
No. I loved your post about your husband, though.![]()
I've got my wife hooked as well. She thinks LF is involved. That is too funny. I had to laugh at your post. Shows just how personally we have taken this. Sometimes, despite exhaustion, I have to get up and come here to see what you all are posting. Lol
Mybelle, you had a post that I was responding to but now it's gone!
Anyways, my husband thinks that the gas can man is either directly involved in murder or knows who ended up with the gas can.
He says that back in his younger days they hung out at the gas station because it was easier to deal there. People always knew where to find them. He said they knew where the cameras were and almost always stayed out of sight. Don't want to be caught on camera selling or doing drugs.
He thinks the gas can man could have been what they called a 'flunkie'. Flunkies wanted to be down so bad that they would do anything for the 'top dogs'. So maybe the gas can man was directly involved or was only used to get the gas. Maybe he didn't know about the cameras or he just simply did not care especially if he knew that was all he had to do.
Either way he thinks the gas can man was used to assist in this crime.
A passing motorist called a sheriff’s employee on Saturday about 8:15 p.m. to report seeing a woman lying near a burning vehicle, Darby said. “She was severely burned; it looks like she was in the car but got out.”