reddress58
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 745
- Reaction score
- 0
I hate to say this, folks. But I don't think LE has much.
why?
what is knightdale? how does it change the case?
was she killed somewhere other than the house and then dumped?
why?
what is knightdale? how does it change the case?
was she killed somewhere other than the house and then dumped?
I too think he will leave them sealed but he seems to be intrigued by the interesting argument...both representing the publics concern. His response should be interesting in terms of his phrasing.
ETA...don't think he's happy this is on his docket
...if he thinks the affidavits are just hearsay.
It really is interesting hearing both sides. Glad I'm not the judge! Both sides have valid arguements. Personally though, I do feel like they should remain sealed. I agree with the DA that it would contaminate investigation.
Posted via Mobile Device
No, I'm assuming the stuff they're looking for that is in the SW's are just heresay and that's why the judge doesn't want them opened. Help explain what he meant, please.Most of them are...NC friends only know what she told them. They had time to compare notes, talk amoungst themselves. There is actually only a few things they witnesses 1st hand.
Thanks, DB. Makes sense.I think the affidavits are "hearsay" because they say what LE suspects happened, and what they believe they may find at the location to be searched.
The only way to know what (and how much) incriminating (or not) evidence LE has would be to see what was seized during the search, and/or affidavits/warrants from subsequent searches that were based upon evidence recovered.
I did too find it more interesting near the end and I too feel he is not going to unseal them, simply because of his statements leaning towards protecting the rights of the persons not there to defend themselves, dependents or future defendants.
I can't hear because of broken speakers...but are you saying Brad's attorneys want them UNSEALED!! Why?!!Right...and I also get the feeling ...since Brad Coopers lawyers want them UN sealed... and the judge/DA saying this could give A defendant an unfair trail... there is someone else beside BC to look at.
Right...and I also get the feeling ...since Brad Coopers lawyers want them UN sealed... and the judge/DA saying this could give A defendant an unfair trail... there is someone else beside BC to look at.
I can't hear because of broken speakers...but are you saying Brad's attorneys want them UNSEALED!! Why?!!
Did Judge Stephens say he was going to issue a decision today? I heard him say he would like to, then my kids came in and I didn't hear the rest.
mt3: the affidavits mentioned in the hearing are documents required as part of the process to obtain/execute a SW. They are different than the custody case documents.