Nancy Cooper, 34, of Cary, N.C. #18

[carolinalady]

Yeah, it's kinda' like the attorney having on his website for people to call him if they have any information about the Nancy Cooper case.

Little bit of de ja vu of the SPeterson case. They had a Peterson website and LE tested them and gave them a tip.........it was NEVER turned over to LE.

I don't know where this lawyer is getting is ideas, but he's playing a very dangerous game with his clients life, POI, suspect, or not.

JMHO
fran

I think the request for info on the attorneys' website is horrible. Definitely not a good idea!

 

[momto3kids]

Well it would fit w/ VoIP, right? I don't understand the Cisco system and would need d99gr81 to let us know how the TWC phone and a Cisco system would work together.

I know nothing about VoIP and will be the 1st to admit it.
The Real White Pages AT&T phone book...go to page 4...Local Service Providers
On the very bottom it has WORLD VoIP NETWORK listed and the numbers of contact. I do not know if this is what you are asking about, but this I did see while flipping the pages today.

 

[carolinalady]

I know nothing about VoIP and will be the 1st to admit it.
The Real White Pages AT&T phone book...go to page 4...Local Service Providers
On the very bottom it has WORLD VoIP NETWORK listed and the numbers of contact. I do not know if this is what you are asking about, but this I did see while flipping the pages today.

I think TWC phone is a VoIP service. I could be very, very wrong as I haven't a clue about VoIP.

Edited to add info from TWC's website (http://www.timewarnercable.com/Caro...Pho/DigitalPho/Is-Digital-Phone-a-VoIP-servic)

Q: Is Digital Phone a VoIP service?
A: While Digital Phone is an IP-based telephony service, unlike most Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers, it is managed over Time Warner Cable’s private IP network so customers’ calls never touch the public Internet.

 

[momto3kids]

Yeah, it's kinda' like the attorney having on his website for people to call him if they have any information about the Nancy Cooper case.

Little bit of de ja vu of the SPeterson case. They had a Peterson website and LE tested them and gave them a tip.........it was NEVER turned over to LE.

I don't know where this lawyer is getting is ideas, but he's playing a very dangerous game with his clients life, POI, suspect, or not.

JMHO
fran

I did not follow the SPeterson case like you did. Isn't it interesting to now go back and reread K&B and see things like...we implore you to come forward and speak with us. .

With the LE so active on this fresh case what purpose is there to derail someone to them?
I can understand if this case had gone cold, but this is certainly not the issue here.

What a RED flag IMO

 

[momto3kids]

I think TWC phone is a VoIP service. I could be very, very wrong as I haven't a clue about VoIP.

Edited to add info from TWC's website (http://www.timewarnercable.com/Caro...Pho/DigitalPho/Is-Digital-Phone-a-VoIP-servic)

Wonderful find IMO:clap:

 

[fran]

I think TWC phone is a VoIP service. I could be very, very wrong as I haven't a clue about VoIP.

Edited to add info from TWC's website (http://www.timewarnercable.com/Caro...Pho/DigitalPho/Is-Digital-Phone-a-VoIP-servic)

Yes, this is a terrific find. So let me understand, and please someone correct me if I'm wrong. I am NO techy!

VoIP is merely a way to control your phone and even network, through your pc and internet?

VoIP is controlled by routers, supplied by someone like Cisco?

VoIP phone calls are detectable once they hit the 'public wires?'

There are ways to hide or go undetected using VoIP, but once it hits the public domain there's no way to hide the activity?

So.......IF TWC doesn't go through the regular worldwide internet, but TWC, does that mean it can be 'altered, changed, falsified?'

I know this sounds complicated and that I don't know what I'm talking about. LOL, and I don't.

JMHO
fran

 

[fran]

I did not follow the SPeterson case like you did. Isn't it interesting to now go back and reread K&B and see things like...we implore you to come forward and speak with us. .

With the LE so active on this fresh case what purpose is there to derail someone to them?
I can understand if this case had gone cold, but this is certainly not the issue here.

What a RED flag IMO

IMVHO, IF they didn't want to give the impression of attempting to hide any possible leads that could guide LE to the REAL killer, they should have just referred any tips to call the PD.......

Perhaps they may want to change it.

fran

 

[momto3kids]

Depending on if the GJ ends at 4pm or 5pm, I would say it is done for the day since it is past 5. I would think the media is close by just hoping if anything was brought forward from the LE they catch wind of it.

The Jan. 08 murder here in Cary, the arrest was done 1 month later once the body of the wife was found.

This has been close to a month, but maybe just not quite long enough to present any info to the GJ.

 

[fran]

I thought at the least, they'd have enough probable cause to at least start everything rolling. But maybe not. Or,........they want it ALL before arresting him.

LOL, bet Brad is breathing a sigh of relief!

JMHO
fran

PS...Oh, next gj is Aug 25.

 

[raisincharlie]

I thought at the least, they'd have enough probable cause to at least start everything rolling. But maybe not. Or,........they want it ALL before arresting him.

LOL, bet Brad is breathing a sigh of relief!

JMHO
fran

PS...Oh, next gj is Aug 25.

The day isn't over yet Fran, still could happen. It has been 16 days since the last warrant - wonder if they are getting slicker at hiding warrants so Ed Crump can't find them, or they just haven't needed anymore warrants.

 

[EntreNous]

If I was Brad I'd be as nervous as a cat right about now.

 

[fran]

The day isn't over yet Fran, still could happen. It has been 16 days since the last warrant - wonder if they are getting slicker at hiding warrants so Ed Crump can't find them, or they just haven't needed anymore warrants.

OK, I'm lost. Who's 'Ed Crump?'

Wouldn't we know by now if there was anything happening? I mean it's late there, right? Going on 7 p.m.

or.........do they do secret grand juries there?

Have you ever seen them indict someone and no one knows until the arrest?

fran

 

[fran]

If I was Brad I'd be as nervous as a cat right about now.

I hope he IS NERVOUS! :woohoo:

Never no what these lawmen will do!

fran

 

[raisincharlie]

OK, I'm lost. Who's 'Ed Crump?'

Wouldn't we know by now if there was anything happening? I mean it's late there, right? Going on 7 p.m.

or.........do they do secret grand juries there?

Have you ever seen them indict someone and no one knows until the arrest?

fran

Ed Crump - ABC 11 in Raleigh - broke the story about the sealed warrants on Cisco and the undisclosed location.


Yes, it is possible no one knows, except LE and maybe a lawyer if the suspect has a lawyer, until the arrest is made...


I don't think it will happen but it is still possible.

 

[carolinalady]

Off topic

RC, did you see that Donald Stephens resealed the sw's in Michelle Young's case for 10 more days. He ruled this past Friday. I posted the link her MY's media thread.

 

[raisincharlie]

Off topic

RC, did you see that Donald Stephens resealed the sw's in Michelle Young's case for 10 more days. He ruled this past Friday. I posted the link her MY's media thread.

I had not seen that but checked out the link you posted. 10 more days and then they will be publically released - very interesting. Have been wanting to see those warrants. Thanks for the heads up. Sure wish LE would solve that case, it has been too long without justice for Michelle.

Same judge by the way who just refused to open the warrants in this case.

 

[jilly]

I had not seen that but checked out the link you posted. 10 more days and then they will be publically released - very interesting. Have been wanting to see those warrants. Thanks for the heads up. Sure wish LE would solve that case, it has been too long without justice for Michelle.

I think we need Ed Crump on the case!
Ten days? Wonder why just 10 more days. I'm going over to read the link. Thanks Carolinalady!

 

[CARYISHOME]

Well....we've done all kinds of speculating here. What is keeping LE from arresting BC? What???? What are they missing?

Could he be innocent?

 

[raisincharlie]

Well....we've done all kinds of speculating here. What is keeping LE from arresting BC? What???? What are they missing?

Could he be innocent?

Could be the lab results aren't back, could be all that stuff collected from his office, home and the infamous undisclosed location has not been completely checked, could be a forensic accountant is not finished, could be...and so on.

 

[CARYISHOME]

Could be the lab results aren't back, could be all that stuff collected from his office, home and the infamous undisclosed location has not been completely checked, could be a forensic accountant is not finished, could be...and so on.

Yeah, I know...I'm just so impatient and really thought it would be a slam dunk. I have conducted investigations (not murder - more of the forensic accounting type) before and know sometimes it takes a lot longer than one might think.

I just really thought something would have happened by now.