Nancy Cooper, 34, of Cary, N.C. #9

[d99gr81]

Oh my it sounds like we need to hook our ex's up - sounds like they deserve each other. :clap:

HAHA wouldn't want my ex on anyone lol believe me shes bad ...bi-polar , psychotic episodes you name it.. well I am sure she will be divorced in the next couple years so will see lol take care i have to go.

 

[fran]

I saved a copy to my hard drive before the name was covered. Looks like WTVD still hasn't covered all of them.

LOL, you baddd girl!

You're too quick for them!


fran

 

[fran]

I agree that the issue of NC's alleged cheating has nothing to do with the custody. OTOH, I don't think it was only mentioned out of spite. If it's true, the "other man" should be investigated, as well, right?

Also, I don't know all the laws about lawyers, but it does in some ways make sense that the divorce lawyer would be called as a witness. Would that be possible if she were also the lawyer in the case? The argument that this would go against the previous client's (NC's) wishes is ridiculous, though.

IF it was merely mentioned to bring LE's attention to the fact, there may be another viable suspect, wouldn't it have been prudent for the {grieving} husband to have called up LE immediately and say "Hey! There's this guy, blah, blah, blah"

or have his attorney call up LE and tell them, 'there's this other guy, blah, blah, blah,'

NOOOOO......they put it in a public document.

It was *cold* and *calculated* IMHO.

Now we see what this attorney, and most especially this {grieving} husband are made of. It's not pretty. Not pretty at all...............


fran

 

[carolinalady]

IF it was merely mentioned to bring LE's attention to the fact, there may be another viable suspect, wouldn't it have been prudent for the {grieving} husband to have called up LE immediately and say "Hey! There's this guy, blah, blah, blah"

or have his attorney call up LE and tell them, 'there's this other guy, blah, blah, blah,'

NOOOOO......they put it in a public document.

It was *cold* and *calculated* IMHO.

Now we see what this attorney, and most especially this {grieving} husband are made of. It's not pretty. Not pretty at all...............


fran

I agree that he should have first and foremost pointed this out to LE. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. LE has consistently said that BC was cooperating w/ police and answering questions.

I have no idea if BC did murder his wife. It certainly doesn't look good for him just based on the info that has been released.

I just want to point out that Ms. Stubbs put this same kind of stuff in a public document (the custody petition).

I think plenty of attorneys play this way (including the practice that Ms. Stubbs works for).

 

[Jess]

Wonderful sense of timing for this lawyer, isn't it ? The day of her memorial, and who knows , maybe a private burial later on. Yup -- they need to have to deal with this on top of an already emotional day.

 

[carolinalady]

Wonderful sense of timing for this lawyer, isn't it ? The day of her memorial, and who knows , maybe a private burial later on. Yup -- they need to have to deal with this on top of an already emotional day.

This is what bothers me most about the whole thing.

 

[T-Rex]

I'm a little confused. The filing says Brad only slept with Heather once, years ago. But her friends give the impression it was an affair, and recent.
Also, are they saying Heather is party to an Alienation of Affections lawsuit involving someone else?
The thing about Nancy having a fling of her own has been mentioned already. But "encounter" makes it sound like a one-time deal.

 

[jilly]

Again .... NC = NO fault state = doesn't matter if he had an affair when it comes to custody

I agree plus - wouldn't matter what State it was.

 

[hckychx1]

So if Ms. Metour is a defendent in an alienation of affection action and she's no longer involved with Mr. Cooper ... how many married men does she ...

Whatever ... going home ... long weekend.

 

[Just the Fax]

I agree w/ this. We see arrests prior to Grand Jury indictments all of the time.

In NC, unless a felony suspect is an immediate danger to himself or others, the cops will present their evidence before a Grand Jury prior to arrest. I will be shocked if that is not the case here.

 

[fran]

I agree that he should have first and foremost pointed this out to LE. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. LE has consistently said that BC was cooperating w/ police and answering questions.

I have no idea if BC did murder his wife. It certainly doesn't look good for him just based on the info that has been released.

I just want to point out that Ms. Stubbs put this same kind of stuff in a public document (the custody petition).

I think plenty of attorneys play this way (including the practice that Ms. Stubbs works for).

I'm willing to wager Mr. Brad hasn't had one conversation with LE since he hired his mouth piece. Of course the excuse is that's just good lawyering type stuff. But, IF your spouse was murdered and you had NOTHING to do with it, MOST prudent people would be calling LE every day. They would WANT the perp caught!

Ms. Stubbs put that info in the public document she filed because it was necessary to win temporary custody of the minor children. It was necessary to prove the children could POSSIBLY be in imminent danger.

Withholding passports,...............they needed the passports and knew he would do this to Nancy, so they needed to put that in the document because they wanted to take Nancy home for her memorial service.

Withholding financial support,........they needed to put that in there because it showed to what extent this alleged loving father would go to get his way. Starving his family, imo.

IMHO, everything in the parent's papers were needed to support their claim. The current paper filed by Mr. Brad's attorney had lots of unnecessary stuff in it, only to make the victim look bad.

Oh, and to file it on the day of Nancy's memorial was *calculated* too. They didn't want too much sympathy for the vicitim and the family,...........oh, and they also didn't want anyone talking about how THE {GRIEVING} HUSBAND COULDN'T EVEN BE BOTHERED, to attend his own murdered wife's service.

"Keep the focus on Nancy."

Yeah, we heard that one a few years ago too. The husband didn't come public because he wanted the 'focus on Laci.' ......circa, scott peterson, convicted of murder 1st degree and 2nd degree, currently incarcerated on Death Row in California, U.S.A.

JMHO
fran

 

[strach304]

I agree that the issue of NC's alleged cheating has nothing to do with the custody. OTOH, I don't think it was only mentioned out of spite. If it's true, the "other man" should be investigated, as well, right?

Also, I don't know all the laws about lawyers, but it does in some ways make sense that the divorce lawyer would be called as a witness. Would that be possible if she were also the lawyer in the case? The argument that this would go against the previous client's (NC's) wishes is ridiculous, though.

I don't remember what news source it was but yesterday or the day before they reported there were 2 POI being investigated. I posted on the thread about it being a bf of NC's because it was right after the rumor of her affair started. I mentioned the possibility of evidence that would indicate a sexual assault as well for the 2nd. POI. So yes he is being looked at. I agree that is exactly why he wants it known that there is someone else to look at besides him but where's the motive if any for the bf? LE has to investigate him of course just for the sake of it. Then Brad can't say that LE didn't thoroughly investigate.

 

[fran]

In NC, unless a felony suspect is an immediate danger to himself or others, the cops will present their evidence before a Grand Jury prior to arrest. I will be shocked if that is not the case here.

Well, he did try to commit suicide once and threatened more recently. I would say 'he's a danger to himself.'

Just sayin'
fran

 

[headndownstream]

No doubt he dressed her corpse in her running gear....what a chilling thought

Yes it is! I also wonder if she was found in the clothes he described. I wonder if he thought up the jog idea before or after he disposed of her. If he is indeed guilty.

I was surprised he could even say what she had on. My husband wouldn't be able to say what I was wearing after spending hours with me. But if he spent time hauling me to a vehicle and delivering me where he wanted me, he probably would remember.

 

[Topsail Girl]

LOL, you baddd girl!

You're too quick for them!


fran

Ha!! Trust me, I've learned the hard way in other cases. SAVE SAVE SAVE!! If you want it to reference later you must save. I'm sure you've been there when you go look for something that didn't make sense in the beginning. You wanna go back and read to clarify and it's poof!! just GONE. I hate that so I save everything now. I have a specific Zip drive that I use just for cases LOL holds 2 gig!! I alerted Ed Crump at WTVD of the oversight - he was grateful

 

[Onescout]

Interesting new developments...seems the lawyers are revving this up.

Here is the irony: Assuming BC did murder his wife because he didn't want to split up the finances in a divorce...he is about to spend it all on this very diligent attorney.

 

[headndownstream]

See I don't agree with this either. I don't see why they would have to wait for this date to make an arrest if they have enough to arrest him now. Doesn't make sense to me. That is saying you know he did it but will not do anything until that date...gives him a chance to run or what ever. They can hold him with out bail if they have evidence so I don't see why the would ever wait to pull a murderer off the street.

The guy is a trained triathlon-er. If he wants to leave, GPS won't stop him. He can do a 2.4 mile ocean swim, a 112 mile bike ride, and a 26 mile run in one day. He can escape.

 

[Just the Fax]

Well, he did try to commit suicide once and threatened more recently. I would say 'he's a danger to himself.'

Just sayin'
fran

Ok, I say let him do what he needs to do.....

Just sayin'

 

[Just the Fax]

The guy is a trained triathlon-er. If he wants to leave, GPS won't stop him. He can do a 2.4 mile ocean swim, a 112 mile bike ride, and a 26 mile run in one day. He can escape.

Reckon he'll escape to the ocean for the swim ?

138 miles on bike and foot will get him right to Wrightsville Beach NC

 

[Just the Fax]

Mr Blum is just posturing. He knows the autopsy report will not convict his client....if it included forensic evidence traced to Brad, he would be behind bars last week.
All of this crap is nothing more than spin to sway doubters...including Cisco.
Other than what was taken from the home and cars with the SW's , he has no idea what evidence the cops have or don't have. Before this is over, look for Mr Blum on all the TV shows looking for his 15 minutes of fame.