strach304
New Member
I hope it's not Geragos!
I do, we see what happened to Snot. :woohoo:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope it's not Geragos!
Gracias. I hadn't time to read it all and work my day job.
Personally, one of the most astounding and ridiculous things I've ever heard, was when a certain investigator seemed to say in that videotaped interview, and I know everyone is only human and can make mistakes, but still: "But we've already checked out some of those sightings, and those kids didn't even look like Caylee...."
When you hear something like that you don't know whether to laugh or cry. If I were a member of the family, I know which one I would do.
I know a lot of people think it's silly to even say this, but, how can we say for sure the nanny doesn't exist? Because they pulled one lady in and questioned her and it wasn't her?
And by the way, how do they ever hope to find Caylee if they always call everyone in advance and tell them when they're going to be coming over? But honestly, how much did they try to find the nanny? I hope the FBI have been on it.
Is it the Federal Bureau of Investigation by the way or was it the Florida Bureau? Are they still conducting an investigation? I haven't heard anything on that front in a long time
I believe from all he has said, he has a real resentment toward CA and he can't see past the end of his nose where she is concerned. He tends to blame everything on her. I don't like her, but I believe KC led them to believe CA was the problem when it was really KC.
You keep saying we can't draw any conclusions about Casey because we really know so little. How can you draw any conclusions about what LE has or hasn't investigated or whether it is unfair or too restricted, when we know so little, really, of what they are up to. They may have fully pursued a myriad of things and reasonably concluded they are dead ends.
That's what I'm trying to do too. I know it's around here somewhere.
Where is the picture from the park that the PI's were on their way to get? :waitasec:
I agree. Who ties up the adults leaves them and takes a 6 yr old. this one really doesn't add up. i hope she touches on this case. i also hope my thoughts are wrong
I beg to differ with you on this Seagull65 but the LE is following up on all leads. Don't you remember the family that awoke in the middle of the night cause someone reported a child in that home might have been Caylee. They did this while searching all avenues in this case. As her being tried in the media her attorneys and anyone else can say that if they want but O.J. was tried in the media a few years back and he got off. Pile of crap if you ask me.It's actually the prosecution who are going to have to present a convincing case of guilt.
Yes, I understand that's true that an accident that occurred during the commission of another crime can legally be "homicide". Not that I agree with it, but there it is.
I'm not saying either that KC won't be convicted of murder, whether or not she ever committed a murder. Generally I do trust juries though. But the climate in this case has been awful. She was convicted of murder in the media before any facts were known in the case at all. LE seemed to conclude that she had killed her child during DAY 1 of the investigation, they told her this more or less. They do not appear to have investigated other possibilities or any other parties in any detail at all.
IMHO, they already have the answers and the unreliable tips and theories that unsupported by even a shred of evidence are pointless. LE has only a certain amount of resources and they are conducting a superb investigation following where the evidence itself is leading them. That's rational. It is also the best use of taxpayer funding. Go LE!
Yeah, but I've looked at missing children websites plenty of times. That's what the pictures on the milk cartons are all about, isn't it? Or the posters in the post office? To make you stop and look. Haven't lots of people looked at the Missing Children's Center website before, just wondering, are there any children in my area that need to be found or whatever? I mean, how does looking at missing children on a website connect with then supposedly murdering ones own child? I never got what that line of thinking was exactly.
KC had had a social life and a baby for three years, why all of a sudden would she want to murder her child? It doesn't add up for me.
regarding the "fake kidnapping" theory involving chloroform, going along those same lines there's also the possibility of a failed suicide attempt, i.e. thinking chloroform would be a painless way to go to eternity along with her child. Or what if someone else used chloroform on the two of them and only KC survived. Or if KC was using it recreationally and Caylee got hold of it. Or that chloroform was in the trunk for other reason (drug manufacture, etc), there was a spill, child was riding in car seat in the back near the spill, etc. Or what if someone did attack KC with chloroform to get Caylee, she woke up and Caylee was gone.... etc
I forgot all about that..!!
They must be saving that one for the Trial.......
I forgot all about that..!!
They must be saving that one for the Trial.......
Are you kidding? What investigation? Besides taking dogs to the house and car (only the Anthony's that is, nobody else's, none of the places where KC had been staying, etc), and sending in a couple samples from said car? Oh, and taking brief statements from a handful of the people who knew KC. Oh I forgot, reading the phone and computer records.
Whatever happened to the FBI supposedly being involved?
LOL The same place as the nanny. Anthony Land.Where is the picture from the park that the PI's were on their way to get? :waitasec: