Another good question would be...What kind of kidnapper takes the child you kidnapped to a McDonald's in the next town over?
LMAO, so true!
Another good question would be...What kind of kidnapper takes the child you kidnapped to a McDonald's in the next town over?
yeah, and to hold the meeting at a nightclub, how tacky is that? i first thought Nejame was the only 'normal' decent person in this entire fiasco, now, not so much.
Another good question would be...What kind of kidnapper takes the child you kidnapped to a McDonald's in the next town over?
Here is a link describing "Side Scan Sonar"
http://www.tritech.co.uk/products/info/products-info-sidescan_sonars.htm
"Finer sediments like clay and silt, on the other hand, do not reflect sound well (low backscatter). " The sonar wouldn't see so well under silt.
JMO but knowing Who Tim is just doesn't seem as important to me as knowing what his qualifications are. If this dive team is expert, then it is legitimate to state that things might have been missed based on someone's level of expertise.
If I get the location correctly, then it is a slow moving river that was under at least 2 feet more of muddy water during the time Caylee went missing. Beyond that, the bottom is silt and there is animal activity. How does someone say for sure that they cleared the river with sonar, even after 3.5 hours, if they never sent a diver in to get a feel for the bottom and what might be there.
I am not defending LP because I cannot wrap my head around these last few hours....but I heard the live stream of the media that was there-some of the reporters saw what almost looked like chicken bones. They stated it flat out. Not rocks-SMALL BONES. Which were then carried away on a stretcher.
It boggles the mind to listen to OSCO spin it as nonsense and that it was not significant-they took ROCKS away on a stretcher? I think not...even if it was not Caylee, the whole thing was BIZARRE.
On the thread "Dennis M (Kid Finders Network) stole all of the memorial flowers for Caylee!" there is a post that says Dennis M is a felon. Does anyone know how he got this honor? (cough, cough)
Here is a link describing "Side Scan Sonar"
http://www.tritech.co.uk/products/info/products-info-sidescan_sonars.htm
"Finer sediments like clay and silt, on the other hand, do not reflect sound well (low backscatter). " The sonar wouldn't see so well under silt.
Angry little man that TM. Glad he won't ever get another donation from us.
I had to contain myself. Using Side Scan Sonar on a bed of silt is like driving with black plastic over your headlights.
I don't understand why Tim is injecting himself in this anyway. It is not his search, it is not his business. He was on TV all day today saying he had throughly checked that river and she was not there, and this was just for publicity. He was on almost every local station there.
If he had to get to NC so quickly as he said that he called off the TES search 36 hours after it started WHY is he still in Orlando?
As for his sonar search.............
It is my understanding sonar can read if there is METAL below the silt, but not bones only.
I just checked with a blackwater(which is not a company but a type of diver) search diver who has been doing this for years and he said sonar is nothing but radar which bounces off the surface of the bottom of a lake - some better than others, but bones or bone fragments will not show. He also said that there is no way in h*ll that TES did that entire river in a day like they claim. He said it is just not possible as it is slow with very experienced people much less volunteers.
It seems to be "growing" each time it is told. To be honest, I just don't believe what he said. Watch his body language and his eyes looking down - I believe he just made that up. LP looked almost like he was going to break into laughter.
I know it had to hurt LP that Tim would do that. Tim should be attacking the family who is hiding the baby and not the searchers.
I tend to take this personally, as there were some remarks made about other independent searchers which I was not going to bring up, but a statement attributed to Tim about a very experienced search team from KY really hacked me off Sunday. He did not like it when they would not agree to be part of TES and made a remark.
Tim needs to KNOW that all searches don't revolve or originate with TES and there are more experienced searchers than he provided for Caylee.
I would like verification that the man was one of Tim's people please.
ummm...Takes money to run a non-profit.
Orlando-based missing-children's organization Never Lose Hope Foundation hired NeJame to help the couple.
NeJame said he is representing George and Cindy Anthony and not their daughter,
The check was presented by Never Lose Hope Foundation, not Nejame. (I was there and stayed for entire meeting)
The foundation is Nejame's boss in this and the check was a gesture that things were worked out between the A's and Tim. How is that a conflict of interest?
Nejame represented or use to represent KFN, which is how he was introduced to and came to represent the Anthony's. A tight group they are.
Thanks, that is what I had been trying to tell these people in my own simplistic way who believe sonar can find anything.
As with any acoustic sonar, side scan sonars only show echoes of objects that reflect sound back to the side scan sonar transducer, such that hard shiny surfaces are sometimes only seen when they are at right angles to the side scan sonar and rough seabed textures can blot out smaller targets completely. Some types of material, such as metals, boulders, gravel or recently extruded volcanic rock, are very efficient at reflecting acoustic pulses (high backscatter). Finer sediments like clay and silt, on the other hand, do not reflect sound well (low backscatter). Strong reflectors create strong echoes, while weak reflectors create weaker echoes. Knowing these characteristics, you can use the strength of acoustic returns from the side scan sonar to examine the composition of the sea floor.
Here is a link describing "Side Scan Sonar"
http://www.tritech.co.uk/products/info/products-info-sidescan_sonars.htm
"Finer sediments like clay and silt, on the other hand, do not reflect sound well (low backscatter). " The sonar wouldn't see so well under silt.
Angry little man that TM. Glad he won't ever get another donation from us.
I had to contain myself. Using Side Scan Sonar on a bed of silt is like driving with black plastic over your headlights.
Here is a link describing "Side Scan Sonar"
http://www.tritech.co.uk/products/info/products-info-sidescan_sonars.htm
"Finer sediments like clay and silt, on the other hand, do not reflect sound well (low backscatter). " The sonar wouldn't see so well under silt.
IIRC Tim said not long ago he would NEVER be on NG again!!!
Or am I really losing my mind?