Nancy Grace Headline News 1 Oct 2008

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Thank you so much for that!:)
I agree, this is great that LE made this move.
I think an arrest is coming soon!

Me too. The status change is the foreshadowing. A little "hint" frpm Mr. Policeman.
 
Ever since I got addicted to this case, it is an emergency when I finally shower!! LOL I have alot of respect for how she managed to spiff up!! I hope she nails the Casey team for any future profits...then what JB?? Will it have been worth it?
 
He sure didn't, did he?

Methinks his KC dream may not have come true!
I would think he'd be smarter than to sign on to a sinking ship like this defense case will be. MOO
 
Heard The A's homeowners insurance could be subject to her lawsuit

Only if they have Personal Injury Coverage, which extends your liability to cover libel, slander, etc. Otherwise, your liability coverage on your homeowner's policy only covers for bodily injury and property damage.
 
Are you talking about kobi..what did he say?

Kobi reiterated that all of the forensics are not out for the public to see but that now she is suspect for murder he is assuming that forensics look bad for the defense. He was careful tonight with words.
 
I think that under the circumstances, she should be lawyered up and she should do whatever she thinks she needs to do. I don't fault or judge her. But on a personal note, I don't think that she was ever really a suspect. There was a lot of speculation that was limited to crime forums - mostly because people were trying desperately to connect the dots and find the links...But I don't really think that it ever went beyond that. KC's lies dominate so much that, from the beginning, it seemed quite clear that something was amiss in the accusation.

JMO

I agree,

I think it took LE all of 2 seconds to rule her out
 
And this is why I don't think ZG stands much of a chance in her lawsuit.

Is there proof that she lost her job because of her connection (none other than having the same first and last name and having visited Sawgrass one time) to this case?

I mean is her boss going to testify that he fired her because of that? I just don't buy it.


Edited: I just don't think there is proof that Casey was targeting this ZG. I think she had the misfortune of having the name that Casey picked. She went to school with someone with the name Z and two families with the name G live on Hope Spring. I don't think it would have made any difference to Casey's story whether a ZG was linked to Sawgrass or not.

What about all the ZG searches KC did on MySpace?
 
KC says ZG last person she saw with her daughter during interview with LE. didn't say kidnapped.
This was always very interesting to me...in the interview she never really did come out and say "kidnap"...or "took my daughter"...but rather, this was the last person I saw my daughter with...or something to that effect. Remember, even in the beginning she said Caylee was with someone who loved her very much...sinister kidnapper? I think not.
 
Because she was not at the time a "public figure", she would be entitled to compensation according to the attorney's I have discussed this with recently.

There is nothing to gain monetarily unless CA homeowners would pay (most likely not for an adult child or they could tie CA into it)

But if you get a judgment, that's some vindication, and you could execute it someday if the defendant ever came into money. Poor Casey. :boohoo: There goes the book deal money. But at least she got a real promotion today from LE.
 
I think that Casey probably changed her story to LE about the kids thing. They knew the names of the two children she still has living with her. Casey invented a zanaida and then by some stroke of sick luck, she found someone with the same name and away she went..the car, sawgrass, the apt # and the cell all came from the Sawgrass info.How creepy can things get?
 
It isn't that simple to totally dismiss, even if it's a difficult case to prove. The law of defamation is pretty complicated in ways. There have even been successful cases of group libel, and I could see ZG proving she was in the small group of ZG's in Orlahndo who people reasonably could have thought less of after the kidnapping accusation. I don't see it as such a frivolous claim that it shouldn't be filed, and I'm not big on filing frivolous lawsuits.

When LE showed KC a picture of ZG didn't she say it Wasn't her?

If so I don't see how ZG could have a claim against KC.

The media took ZG's name & ran with it but according to KC she's not the "Nanny"
 
Me too..I would like for someone to admit it has just a pinch to do with money though LOL.

What if it doesn't?

If she maligned me like that, I'd make her eat it, money or not. In court.
 
This was always very interesting to me...in the interview she never really did come out and say "kidnap"...or "took my daughter"...but rather, this was the last person I saw my daughter with...or something to that effect. Remember, even in the beginning she said Caylee was with someone who loved her very much...sinister kidnapper? I think not.

It stood out to me as well. She does it all the time! A pathological liar takes a bit of the truth and then spins a tale to suit them. When confronted they will say " oh, I never said she was kidnapped." which is true. The words "taken" and "kidnapped" were used by Cindy.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
208
Guests online
322
Total visitors
530

Forum statistics

Threads
609,719
Messages
18,257,268
Members
234,735
Latest member
SophBlue
Back
Top