Nancy Grace Headline News 1 Oct 2008

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
KC's login, the specific MySpace profile for ZFG. Per LE.

I'll have to check again, but I don't believe the search was done on Casey's computer or that the results of the search were released.
 
very good points. :clap: I'm beginning to think casey might have been smart enough not to specifically id this zg when le showed her the photo because she knew she was falsely accusing somebody of something and zg could've had an airtight alibi which casey wouldn't know and it could backfire big time in casey's face. Moo

Bingo! NC sleuthin' represent!
 
I think Zenaida has a case. The apt. ZG looked at was the same apt. KC said she dropped Caylee of at. That's no coincidence. KC had been looking at apts. for her and TonE. I think she saw ZG that day at Sawgrass and her lie began there. She just didnt think her lie through well enough, because she was too busy getting stoned, partying, cooking her man dinner and driving around w/ a dead body in her car. She never thought this would go to LE and that is why she didnt come up w/ a better story.
 
When LE showed KC a picture of ZG didn't she say it Wasn't her?

If so I don't see how ZG could have a claim against KC.

The media took ZG's name & ran with it but according to KC she's not the "Nanny"

We've already been through this question...If KC had said to LE, 'yep, that's her,' there would have gone her defense. Even if she had ever seen Z before, why, oh why, would she identify her? If she had, she couldn't have changed her story to JBlanchard Park and Z's sister, or to Puerto Rico.

And the media, bloggers, whomever, could have never taken a name and run with it if KC hadn't put it out there in the first place. Ergo, KC's guilty of defaming the good name of ZG. Period.
 
I thought it was determined that it was not possible to know if she searched earlier because the file was created in 2007..but I thought there was another file as well? ..
Dont answer that..Ill go back to the appropriate thread and look..:crazy:

I though there were three searches, the first on 10/07.

Please look it up for both Willly and me, Princess. I'm a Luddite, in this area.
 
Very good points. :clap: I'm beginning to think Casey might have been smart enough not to specifically id this ZG when LE showed her the photo because she knew she was falsely accusing somebody of something and ZG could've had an airtight alibi which Casey wouldn't know and it could backfire big time in Casey's face. MOO

She needed to keep LE looking and not finding at that point, in NY, NC, etc. The goal for CA was always to buy time.
 
Because she was not at the time a "public figure", she would be entitled to compensation according to the attorney's I have discussed this with recently.

There is nothing to gain monetarily unless CA homeowners would pay (most likely not for an adult child or they could tie CA into it)

Thanks, TT. My attorneys said the same thing.
 
Only if they have Personal Injury Coverage, which extends your liability to cover libel, slander, etc. Otherwise, your liability coverage on your homeowner's policy only covers for bodily injury and property damage.

Would that coverage extend to anyone living in the house or only to the owners of the house?
 
I agree,

I think it took LE all of 2 seconds to rule her out

About that. But, in the meantime, KC kept hollaring and insisting ZFG! ZFG! And, KC gets more attention.
 
Maybe because she was sitting in a room with experienced law enforcement, and she'd done enough research online to know about Zenaida, but didn't want them to explicitly go after HER because when they did they'd find out she didn't take Caylee?

I don't think she meant to pin it on Zenaida; in my personal unprofessional opinion, it was never supposed to go down with them finding the car with Cindy tracking Casey down and calling the cops ... I think the plan was for law enforcement to think something sinister had gone down, and Zenaida was supposed to remain nameless.. she just based way too much of the character on someone real that she had looked up previously.
...and I'm starting to think she was just trying to put a face to the "name" Zani she had been using for so long. Remember, she hadn't been working for quite some time. I believe her parents were getting VERY suspicious. GA took off after her for a reason. I think she was "beefing" up her story so to speak. Why? Well, either to cover up what she really was doing...perhaps because she got a real kick out of her lying (especially when people believed her)...or simply because she was just plain bored. I agree...I don't think she planned it to go down like this.
 
I though there were three searches, the first on 10/07.

Please look it up for both Willly and me, Princess. I'm a Luddite, in this area.

According to the computer forensic report, the only searches found for ZFG were done on 7/16/08. Those search created cookies. Those cookies were stored in already existing index.dat files from 10/7/07 and 6/12/08.
 
When LE showed KC a picture of ZG didn't she say it Wasn't her?

If so I don't see how ZG could have a claim against KC.

The media took ZG's name & ran with it but according to KC she's not the "Nanny"

Well, two of us, on this thread, consulted lawyers and were told something different.
 
But if you get a judgment, that's some vindication, and you could execute it someday if the defendant ever came into money. Poor Casey. :boohoo: There goes the book deal money. But at least she got a real promotion today from LE.
Yes I would like to applaud LE for their "promotion " of Casey today! :clap:

Wonder how Casey is feeling about that promotion tonight. :behindbar
 
ZFG looked at Sawgrass on June 17th.

Casey borrowed Tony's car to make a Target run on June 17th.

What was in wrong with Casey's car on that day?

Nothing. But, Tony was out of town, and KC had the keys.
 
Because she was not at the time a "public figure", she would be entitled to compensation according to the attorney's I have discussed this with recently.

There is nothing to gain monetarily unless CA homeowners would pay (most likely not for an adult child or they could tie CA into it)

Turbo, anyone who wins a slander or libel suit is entitled to compensation. If she was a public figure, she would have to prove the statement was made with malice.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
91
Guests online
210
Total visitors
301

Forum statistics

Threads
609,259
Messages
18,251,437
Members
234,585
Latest member
Mocha55
Back
Top