oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,707
While this was a well written post and your point was taken, it didn't address the issue. Granted, a RO isn't worth the paper it is written on as long as no protection is offered to the victim.
In a military setting, you have people trained to handle situations to protect themselves and their fellow troops. You also have the aspect of them being trained to kill. I believe this is why the Military needs to step in to offer protection on a larger scale. The average person in a domestic dispute does not have such training and it escalates the risk to the Military spouse/partner. They have a larger responsibility to control their troops after they know there could be an issue of violence, imo.
I certainly understand what you are saying SS but even if they are in the military they have the same constitutional rights as we all do. Their judicial laws and how to contain their people are very similar to the guidelines adhered to in our society concerning MPO vs. RO which is very lacking, I agree, in both sectors.
Most are not trained to kill. They may go through basic training learning methods of protection against a faux enemy there but many of them have MOSs that have nothing to do with actually fighting in battles..most of the ones in that MOS are called Grunts. They can be in admin., accounting, medical, mechanics, supply clerks, water control, electricians, or many other fields.
When these crimes occur in the military I do not find their methods any different than the regular Joe Schmoe who does the same dastardly deeds.
imoo