NC - Erica Lynn Parsons, 13, Rowan County, 19 Nov 2011 - #3

[2rose]

^ and yet BP said she never went to McD's with SP, CP & Erica, although CP claimed she was along
odd

Yes I can only hope the children were able to confirm or negate some of what has been claimed....poor kids to be in the middle of this

Yes lots of contradictions in this case and unfortunately
we have so little information being shared for clarification.

In the past 2 years the PARSONS family has gone from a 6 sibling family
to these parents having NO dependent children living with them.
It must be hardest on the 2 youngest children.

I have also thought it must be a very trying situation for all the children ...
about which things they back their parents about and what they disagree with.

 

[sreshowtime]

Ascha- yes thank you...I am familiar with what both places actually are and their purpose, I was merely alluding to the fact they are places that are attractions, that some may view as bigger than life...or places that are fun, visually appealing, etc etc

yeah I know I pull inane stuff out to ponder. But assuming CP's story is muck...why choose Asheville/Biltmore? I guess looking at the reasoning behind why that locale was used/chosen, as it might shed light as to the true location of Erica is one of the weird things I ponder.
oh well I will hush, that's the norm... I am usually misunderstood....with my ramblings.

May Erica be found.

 

[ACandyRose]

This is old news, really. I'm surprised you haven't heard about this. But here is recent article. It is also discussed in the links I provided about Carolyn meeting with investigators.

http://www.wcnc.com/news/searching-...local-officials-are-accusatory-223009821.html

Esquire, thank you, but perhaps you misunderstood my question. There is nothing in that media link (printed or video) that answers the question to the comment you made, which was:

"I have been talking about her because that is the only person who has been publicly named as having direct knowledge concerning Erica's disappearance other than Casey and Sandy Parsons."

I read the article and then listened to the 3:17 minute video again and the only reference made regarding Carolyn was that news spotted her coming out of the Rowan County Sheriff's Office (at 2:36 min) and that she didn't talk to the news people, and then at the end of video (at 3:01 min) the lady at the news station says, and I quote, "Okay, you mentioned Carolyn Parsons. On her Facebook page she says she never introduced Casey and Sandy to Nan, the woman that the parents say Erica went to live with."

And in the printed section of the news link you provided is the following quote:

"Carolyn Parsons, Erica's biological mother was spotted leaving the courthouse shortly after noon on Monday, escorted out by a deputy. Officials have not confirmed if she was on site for an interview. She didn’t speak to media. On Carolyn Parsons’ Facebook page, she says she never introduced Casey and Sandy to "Nan", the woman the parent say Erica went to live with."

Thank you,
ACR

 

[graush26]

Could you please provide an MSM link that backs up your statement that
the PARSONS are the ones who asked Nan to meet them at McDonalds ?

I didn't state, I asked. I keep forgetting that I have to play along with this Nan story. As far as their story always having a reason not to go to Nan's house, I keep that as my suspicious thought of the day for CP and SP.

 

[prima.facie]

This is old news, really. I'm surprised you haven't heard about this. But here is recent article. It is also discussed in the links I provided about Carolyn meeting with investigators.

http://www.wcnc.com/news/searching-...local-officials-are-accusatory-223009821.html

There is absolutely nothing in that article to support your theory.
Again, you are solely basing your theories on believing the parsons who have proven to be liars and LE have said are liars.

 

[prima.facie]

I didn't state, I asked. I keep forgetting that I have to play along with this Nan story. As far as their story always having a reason not to go to Nan's house, I keep that as my suspicious thought of the day for CP and SP.

exactly. in order to further talk about anything relating to "nan" you have to actually believe that a nan existed.

I don't. at all.

I believe casey and her mute husband are responsible for the disappearance and there NEVER EVER EVER EVER was some person that they handed Erica off to.

total fabricated ridiculous story.

 

[graush26]

After reading the Jon Benet Ramsey by Steve Thomas and reading that CP has magazine/books about the Ramsey case, it may be a bit frustrating to play by the rules on websleuths. I mean, in the book, the Ramseys continually gave completely fabricated stories to the msm. I just have a feeling that Nan will equal the foreign faction in the ransom letter. Strawberry and the other girl will either be like the neighbors who were blamed or just fabricated like some of phantom burglers. Most of all, CP will go to her grave not telling the truth. Hope LE has more to go
On that just disproving lies, because that didn't go well with Jon benet. :/

 

[stillwatersc]

I doubt Erica was ever allowed to go on FB before she disappered and afterwards, it was Casey pretending to be Erica on FB. Any reference or communication that Casey had with Erica, Nan, etc has been deleted, lost or thrown away. Carolyn was able to produce screen shots from FB with her communications with Casey.
Absolutely nothing that Casey or Sandy says can be considered a 'fact'. On this case you have to always remember that you are dealing with proven liars and not get sucked into their Fantasy Land. It gets confusing trying to separate the true facts with the fiction coming from Casey. It would be beneficial to split up all our information into categories: Reported facts; Casey's "Story"; Carolyn's version

Also - could LE have requested DNA from Carolyn to compare with the red substance found on the baseboards? How long ago was the evidence collected and how long would it take to test for human blood? It seems reasonable they could run prelim testing to identify the red substance to determine if DNA testing was required.

 

[Considering]

The supposed reason that McDonalds was picked, was because Nan was familiar with it.
The only identifier I recall is that, it is the McDonalds that Carolyn has previously worked at,
but it was not mentioned how long ago that was.

Yes, Casey did say that Nan was familiar with the McDonald's where she met Nan to pick up Erica. However, I believe the idea that it was the McDonald's that Carolyn had worked at in Mooresville was speculation that began with a FB comment (rumor) that a poster here at WS reportedly read that indicated that Carolyn worked at a McDonald's in Mooresville:

Originally posted by Ihavemyownangel, Thread 1, Post 921:

Interesting find.....JHB on CarP FB says that CarP use to work at a McDonalds in Mooresville. I find this information very interesting if it is true....

A response to above post then made it appear that it was the same McDonald's that Carolyn worked at in Mooresville:

Originally posted by Solariis, Thread 1, Post 928:

Well that's a VERY interesting coincidence....the bio mother used to work at the location CP claims to have dropped off EP with Nan....hmmm something really stinks here

I don't think anything has been mentioned in msm about Carolyn working at a McDonald's in Mooresville. IIRC, the only identifer of where Casey claims she took Erica to meet Nan was "...we met at McDonald's in Mooresville."

http://www.salisburypost.com/interactive/video
(August 9 interview, part 1)

I don't think we know at this time which McDonald's Casey is referring to when she says, "McDonald's in Mooresville." Technically, there are four McDonald's that I can think of that would have Mooresville addresses. It could be any of them that Casey is referencing. As I said earlier, it's only my speculation that the one on E. Plaza Dr. is the most likely one for Casey to be using as a drop-off/pick-up point for Erica.

 

[2rose]

exactly. in order to further talk about anything relating to "nan" you have to actually believe that a nan existed.
I don't. at all.I believe casey and her mute husband are responsible for the disappearance and there NEVER EVER EVER EVER was some person that they handed Erica off to. total fabricated ridiculous story.

But here on websleuths we have to cite MSM ... and the Nan story is what MSM articles cover.
Although many of us would like to cite LE, we can't, because LE are not divulging any info.

 

[graush26]

I read your post. I'm not sure if Carolyn worked at a McDonald's in the area of the drop off either, but I will wait to see if anything bears fruit with that claim. I would find it very damning to Casey's story if it was well known that Carolyn worked at the McDonald's where the fake drop off was though. When I say damning, I mean a step above the unbelievable story that is now

 

[ACandyRose]

For me, one of the more telling written word references, by Casey Parsons herself, that she no longer included Erica as part of her family are from her own words on her "Meet Our Family" web page.

http://www.parsonskennel.com/meet-our-family.html

Although the actual web page "Meet Our Family" is not dated, but there are dates and reference within Casey Parsons' written family story that narrows the date to be after June 10, 2012, when the youngest child, a boy, would be 6 years old.

Those references are:

- Referencing her oldest son, "He married a very wonderful girl in Aug. 2011" (So clearly this family story is written after August 2011.)

- Casey goes on to write, "I have 3 boys and 2 girls. My oldest is 20 and the youngest is a boy and he is 6yrs. My kids are my life." (This dates the story after June 10, 2012 as the last child, a boy, was born in 2006. See reference below on Casey's Tubal Ligation Reversal Surgery story)

- Casey also wrote, "We have 5 wonderful kids." (If Erica were included, she would have 6 wonderful kids)

- Casey also wrote, "I do homeschool my kids, only 3 is in school." (In 2012, if she was including Erica, she would have 4 kids in school.)

This dates the "family story" web page to at least June 10, 2012 (but not after June 10, 2013).

"Tubal Ligation Reversal Surgery" web page link referenced:
(Casey proudly lists all her children names, full birth dates).
http://www.riobravoreversal.com/testimonies/stories/2003/parsons_s.html

ACR

 

[ACandyRose]

But here on websleuths we have to cite MSM ... and the Nan story is what MSM articles cover.
Although many of us would like to cite LE, we can't, because LE are not divulging any info.

Correct that LE is not speaking out to the media but we surely we can reference any information that was included in the legal search warrants, written by LE, that were released (and even quoted) in the main stream media.

 

[graush26]

But here on websleuths we have to cite MSM ... and the Nan story is what MSM articles cover.
Although many of us would like to cite LE, we can't, because LE are not divulging any info.

Do we have to keep calling her Nan? Even CP doesn't believe what she was told anymore. Can we just call her "the Facebook Granny"? Or the Seenior sitizin slooth?

 

[2rose]

Do we have to keep calling her Nan? Even CP doesn't believe what she was told anymore. Can we just call her "the Facebook Granny"? Or the Seenior sitizin slooth?

Nan is the name referenced in all MSM articles which we have to cite.
Personally I see no benefit to using other fake names ...
I am not into the whole ridiculing people aspect.
I think it is more appropriate to be serious when discussing a serious topic like a missing child.

 

[scmom]

What's so infuriating about Erica's disappearance is that whatever stories the adoptive parents have told have not resulted in any clue to her whereabouts.
And not to be disrespectful to whatever of Erica's family that loves her; I don't see anything but the efforts of LE and the news media to find her, along with the public who are horrified that another child is missing under very questionable circumstances.
Now, where are we to look for Erica?

 

[2rose]

Correct that LE is not speaking out to the media but we surely we can reference any information that was included in the legal search warrants, written by LE, that were released (and even quoted) in the main stream media.

Certainly we can & have ... but the more interesting facts of those will be when/if LE reveal the analysis of the items seized in those warrants.

MSM keeps coming out with new articles but LE doesn't keep releasing new info ...
so we go with what is available to us.

 

[graush26]

Nan is the name referenced in all MSM articles which we have to cite.
Personally I see no benefit to using other fake names ...
I am not into the whole ridiculing people aspect.
I think it is more appropriate to be serious when discussing a serious topic like a missing child.

I am very serious. MSM has said that Nan is not a real person. By continuing to refer to Nan gives credence to the story. There is no Nan. Everyone involved has agreed. We do know that Casey has met a woman in her late 70s, early 80s on Facebook and in person. We also have been told that this senior citizen convinced an adult through detail of numerous related people, that she was someone that she is not. I am making a point and not ridiculing anyone...much.

 

[Considering]

From the search warrant for the home:

James stated that on a morning in November or December 2011 he awoke and realized his sister Erica Lynn Parsons was not at the home. At the time Erica was approximately 13 years of age. James Parsons stated he asked his parents Sandy and Casey Parsons where Erica was at and Sandy and Casey told James that they had been to Asheville, North Carolina and took Erica to her grandmother's residence.

http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2013/08/15/PARSONS_SEARCH_WARRANT_1.PDF

Even if I pretend that they took Erica took to a McDonald's in Mooresville instead of to "her grandmother's residence" in Asheville as the warrant states, I still have yet another question...

Jamie awoke one morning to find Erica gone. He asked Sandy and Casey where she was and they said they had been to Asheville and took Erica to her grandmother's residence. From this statement it seems that Erica was at the home when Jamie went to bed and was gone when he awoke in the morning. So, I'm to believe that Sandy and Casey took Erica to McDonald's to meet "Nan" (who's around 80 years old and driving 2 hours from Asheville to Mooresville and then 2 hours back to Asheville) during the night?

 

[Considering]

Certainly we can & have ... but the more interesting facts of those will be when/if LE reveal the analysis of the items seized in those warrants.

MSM keeps coming out with new articles but LE doesn't keep releasing new info ...
so we go with what is available to us.

I would like to give a standing ovation to the local media for keeping Erica in the news. Great job!

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: