GUILTY NC - Jason Corbett, 39, murdered in his Wallburg home, 2 Aug 2015 #7

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Those are very good points. I agree that it's possible that MM rather than TM wielded the bat and she was the primary assailant. It' also possible that TM heard the beating, saw what happened and decided to concoct a cover story for MM.

However, if that's the case, then she must have started the assault when Jason was sleeping. I don't think that MM was physically capable of picking up a bat and/or a brick during a typical marital argument and beating her husband to death. Jason could have defended himself if he had been awake. She must have stunned and hurt him badly while he was asleep and then finished the assault after he tried to get up and defend himself. Yes, I will concede that such a scenario is possible. I agree that her background makes it seem even more possible.

All this his makes me wonder to what extent does the prosecution need to convince the jury of exactly how the murder unfolded. Does the prosecution need to convince the jury of a particular scenario or just that a murder was committed by MM and TM with a bat and a brick and the details of who delivered the blows and when don't matter that much?


I think the point is well taken that Molly could not have subdued an awakened Jason. He had to have been asleep or drugged. So if the FBI man had his daughter awaken him and say she thinks she killed her husband, he's going to assess the scene. No one will accept she could take Jason down without incapacitating him. If she did, that is Murder One.

How do we save Molly, keep the kids in our family? That's when Tom decided to insert himself. He would do what his experience told him was their best option.

The DV accusation and Tom as hero and the only assailant ( at first) ...was the only option they had that might work. Tom would handle it all. Sharon must stay completely out of it.

It is and was their only shot. Tom wasn't trying to save his daughter with a bat...but with his trained FBI brain.
 
Photos shown in court show the blood splatter on the back of the bedroom door. Who closed the door? Did TM enter and fear for Molly's life and then close the door? Why didn't he advice her to run? Why was that door closed? The defense wants us to believe it was a matter of life or death for TM and Molly. Who closed the door? Why did Molly not run? Check on Jason's children? Check on her mother? Why when TM reported on the 911 call he hit Jason, during that hit why did Molly not call 911? Why did Sharon not come upstairs? While the house appears large, it sits closely to the road. How did Sharon not hear the ambulance, fire truck and police? So many whys. But what strikes me most is in the mist of the "donney brook" why did Molly not run. That is if Molly and TM are telling the truth.


Its questions like this that the prosecutor needs to ask the jury in his closing argument. For the defense, the "devil" is in the details that just don't make sense.

For starters, we have The Curious Case of the Pristine Killers...with their victim looking like a bloody soaking mess, the room with spatters and pools of his blood everywhere, but Molly and Tom look like they could pose for the family Christmas card. (Well, except that he has no pants on.)

Then we have the "Worlds Most Distinterested Woman" in the basement. She is awakened by a scream upstairs, where her daughter and beloved step-grandchildren are sleeping. Her elderly husband goes up there, armed with a baseball bat to face...who knows what? Remember "the last thing TM expected to see" was this altercation between Jason and Molly. So SM doesn't know what he is up against. Is it a burglar? A serial killer? Does he have a gun when her husband only has a bat? Sharon doesn't know. But, she never uses any of the four cell phones in the room to call for help. I guess she just sits and waits to see how it all turns out. This takes the term "laid back" to a whole new dimension.

In time she hears sirens, ambulance arriving, commotion. But when the police come downstairs, she asks "Is everything all right?" Like a nice waitress. Is this not the strangest storyline of all? And she has never called 911. Never summoned help.

Why not summon help?

Would summoning help actually endanger ( legally) the people SHE loved?

Then there's this closed door. In the search warrant, I believe it says that Jason was attacking Molly " inside the master bedroom door." I always thought this was curious phrasing. Why not just "inside the master bedroom." Did Tom's story involve the door? Was he claiming that Jason had Molly up against that door that leads from the hall? But if a big man like Jason had his wife up against that door, Tom Martens would have had real difficulty getting in to help her.

Now we find out its Jason's blood "inside" and on the bedroom door. He was up against that door at some point. But where did this idea come from that Molly was held "inside the Master bedroom door?"

So was Tom just repeating what his daughter told him after the killing? Did she say he was choking her "inside the Master Bedroom door?" Either against the door...or if the door was open...against the wall behind the door?

Maybe TM only arrived after the killing. I'm beginning to believe more and more that actually was the case.
 
The question still stands, why did TM close the door behind him. I hope the jury asked themselves these questions.

I suspect TM will say when he went in initially he didn't want to wake the kids and thought he could diffuse the situation so he closed the door to keep the noise down ... they will
Have thought of most things.
 
If all items in the room that are overturned or moved in any way are clear of all prints then we have a staged scene beyond reasonable doubt in my opinion maybe that's where it's going tick the items off one by one. If your living in a house and your bedside lamp has no prints on it from any party... now that's interesting if that's what is to be told in coming days.



Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk
 
[video=twitter;892380688300871681]https://twitter.com/mallorylanewxii/status/892380688300871681[/video]


[video=twitter;892381147333894144]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892381147333894144[/video]


very interesting
 
[video=twitter;892381420060061696]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892381420060061696[/video]
 
I have always believed the bedroom door was closed. it would have been closed anyway when just molly and jason were in the bedroom.... TM comes along then hears whatever was going on, goes into the room and shuts it behind him to minimise noise which would wake up the kids. so whatever went down in that room, the door would have been closed either way unless one of them tried to leave the room which doesnt seem to have happened. A hallway leading from the bedroom into their bathroom was mentioned... is this an ensuite as us Irish would know it or a regular hallway outside of the bedroom. I am unsure about where the blood was that the police where shielding the kids from seeing when taking them out of the house. If jason made it out into a hallway leaving a bloodtrail outside of the bedroom near the children's rooms, how did he end up back inside the bedroom! sorry, just confused here a bit if anyone can help me out! reporting is soooo shoddy its unreal. nearly every publication has a different variant of the witness testimony.
 
[video=twitter;892380688300871681]https://twitter.com/mallorylanewxii/status/892380688300871681[/video]
[video=twitter;892381147333894144]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892381147333894144[/video]
very interesting

tricky one as it would be perceived as hearsay!
 
I have always believed the bedroom door was closed. it would have been closed anyway when just molly and jason were in the bedroom.... TM comes along then hears whatever was going on, goes into the room and shuts it behind him to minimise noise which would wake up the kids. so whatever went down in that room, the door would have been closed either way unless one of them tried to leave the room which doesnt seem to have happened. A hallway leading from the bedroom into their bathroom was mentioned... is this an ensuite as us Irish would know it or a regular hallway outside of the bedroom. I am unsure about where the blood was that the police where shielding the kids from seeing when taking them out of the house. If jason made it out into a hallway leaving a bloodtrail outside of the bedroom near the children's rooms, how did he end up back inside the bedroom! sorry, just confused here a bit if anyone can help me out! reporting is soooo shoddy its unreal. nearly every publication has a different variant of the witness testimony.


Jason was taken out on a board that's why there was a blood trial. Hallway is to ensuite
 
[video=twitter;892382994752778242]https://twitter.com/tvtdaniel/status/892382994752778242[/video]


[video=twitter;892383457837449217]https://twitter.com/tvtdaniel/status/892383457837449217[/video]
 
[video=twitter;892382994752778242]https://twitter.com/tvtdaniel/status/892382994752778242[/video]
Ohhhh now.... That could be used either way... Defence could claim TM had no love for jason because of the way he was allegedly treating his daughter!

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk
 
[video=twitter;892382994752778242]https://twitter.com/tvtdaniel/status/892382994752778242[/video]
Tom is proving to be a very very dark horse ...If this is true
Looking forward to playing golf with/hated ?? Cookies, sunshine and light and holidays/DV ??

Very interesting

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk
 
Ohhhh now.... That could be used either way... Defence could claim TM had no love for jason because of the way he was allegedly treating his daughter!

Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk
Hope is it would give us an insight into tm character. Could be very helpful. I say let defence spin it, if they are a credible witness testimony will hold up to questioning

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk
 
I'm just assuming could be wrong but if he told his colleague he hated Jason he would have said why I don't think he would say I hate my son in law and not expand on it . He obviously felt comfortable talking to this colleague and they had some kind of friendship unless he told everyone he hated Jason
 
[video=twitter;892387065928839168]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892387065928839168[/video]

[video=twitter;892387261005869056]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892387261005869056[/video]
 
[video=twitter;892387065928839168]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892387065928839168[/video]

[video=twitter;892387261005869056]https://twitter.com/lexdispatchbc/status/892387261005869056[/video]
How might it incriminate her does anyone know?

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk
 
[video=twitter;892389253870649345]https://twitter.com/tvtdaniel/status/892389253870649345[/video]



[video=twitter;892381590680211457]https://twitter.com/mhewlettwsj/status/892381590680211457[/video]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
2,990
Total visitors
3,144

Forum statistics

Threads
602,874
Messages
18,148,116
Members
231,564
Latest member
onlyimagine
Back
Top