borndem
Anglophile & registered demwit
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 19,318
- Reaction score
- 50,918
But in this case , Laura was the unfortunate victim, & AH is on trial for her murder- whether or not she was manipulated by GH, she surely played a major role in Laura's murder, & she should have to face the consequences of her actions.
Re-reading these posts on this snowy day....
Your good post here, thistle, reminded me of the phrase, "I was only following orders." Well that didn't go to well for some folks (and I'm NOT comparing the magnitude of the crimes/deed, please know) in 1945-46, and it won't win any fans here, either.
Like so many have already said here, even if she didn't know of the murder and the subsequent obscenities that were done in that bathroom not more than 50 ft away from her (and we all know that her words on that are pure B.S.) -- the one that she scrubbed and made look like new -- she still was a willing participant to keep the kids away from GH while the killing was being done, and to help him by taking the kids out of the apt, to contact her sister about visiting, by financing the whole thing, etc., etc. I'm just hoping the closing remark will explain that if they feel that she was not complicit in everything (which she was), being complicit in some of them make her a partner in the acts, thus Acting in Concert -- not merely after-the-fact help.
And those various acts occurred before, during and after the planned luring-over and murder and body desecration. She could have thrown herself on the mercy of the good folks at Chik-fil-a and asked them to call LE -- she had the kids so there was no excuse; instead, she ordered her scheming, murdering husband a meal and a beverage.
Don't try to cry Amanda -- we know why there are no tears.
rant over... :rant: