CUCKOOHEAD
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2012
- Messages
- 5,540
- Reaction score
- 12
Hope Geevee is right. 'Til tomorrow.
I'm going to try to follow this one, too. I missed it last time around. Do we have a start date on this, or is it still up in the air? I know I read something about jury selection beginning yesterday, but I also read something about a delay in mailing the jury summons. Do we know what's up?
I am never going to fall for that bowling ball telling me it's a crystal ball again!
Where did Amanda get all the money from, that the state was talking about in closing arguments? Thank you.
Her husband before Grant passed away and left her a trust, some property and jewelry.
I checked the Durham County Court docket yesterday NCB, and the trial was still scheduled for yesterday -- but a couple of weeks ago, there was an announcement about the jury summons documents not being mailed and the trial was delayed for 30 days, so I guess it should start in mid-March. I haven't seen anything on it in the news, so I guess there is yet another delay. Bummer.
One thing I've wrestled with is why did this happen? It seems to be popular opinion or even the court's idea that GH & AH wanted those boys. I'm thinking it may be more in line with what so many other "man kills the mother of his child(ren)" scenarios - child support. If LA got custody or more custody, child support might have or probably would have been an issue. And with that, GH would HAVE to get a job - a real job. He would have to stop wasting money traveling. He spent (or they spent) all of AH's money. AH was caring for an infant and wouldn't have been able to work. Regardless of her working or not, it would be GH who would have to shoulder the child support - which meant GET A JOB. I think he didn't want to work. He loved not growing up (like so many of them do) and all the responsibility falls on someone else. Suddenly, he knows he will be forced to do something like earn a living and he gets resentful to point of murder. Just a thought. As for AH, I guess she got caught up in it or she's just crazy.
JusticeFever,
Hubby #3 Nicky Smith was a successful TX businessman. He died from complications after a swimming accident. They hadn't been married very long but Amanda as wife inherited quite a bit. Half of his companies, a home in Austin. His holdings included a working farm and a separate irrigation business. She sold her half of the irrigation business to his brother. Sold the house.
Hubby #2 was her Divorce attorney from hubby #1. Not sure what sort of settlement she got when that marriage imploded.
JusticeFever,
Hubby #3 Nicky Smith was a successful TX businessman. He died from complications after a swimming accident. They hadn't been married very long but Amanda as wife inherited quite a bit. Half of his companies, a home in Austin. His holdings included a working farm and a separate irrigation business. She sold her half of the irrigation business to his brother. Sold the house.
Hubby #2 was her Divorce attorney from hubby #1. Not sure what sort of settlement she got when that marriage imploded.
:seeya: Hi Hadassah, welcome back (I seem to remember you being here for another trial, maybe Grant Hayes?)
The examples above are pretty messed up, brought to mind one case that makes me just ANGRY....Karla Homolka.
That she is free and living a new life is just SO WRONG.
did the jury go home for the day??
Karla lied in her plea bargain and the court could have revoked the agreement but didn't. She's living on some island with her lawyers brother whom she married and 2 or 3 little ones. A travesty of justice