Namus used to tell you the status of DNA samples (and other identifiers). So if a UID and a MP both had DNA submitted and tests completed then yes you would know they had already been tested against each other. Their new site no longer does this so it’s now a guessing game.I got a standard response back from the assigned NamUs Regional Program Specialist but nothing else so far. I'm guessing these things move slow as molasses. So how does it work? Is there a way to tell if family reference samples are already submitted for Teresa Cupps? Since there are rule outs listed for her case, I assumed that meant there must be some DNA already submitted, but I could be wrong on that. Besides, if there is already a reference sample, why wouldn't the two cases have been matched during some kind of automated, routine comparison?
I am more sure than ever that it is a match. My guess is that she was on her way to the beach when something happened. Her friends may have been scared to call authorities (some friends, eh?) Highway 74 is a popular route to the beach here in NC, and it was the time of year for it. I live along the same route only an hour up the road, and a large percentage of our local businesses used to depend on beach traffic for revenue. Here is one additional comparison between the UID's profile composite and a more angled image of Teresa Cupps:
Namus used to tell you the status of DNA samples (and other identifiers). So if a UID and a MP both had DNA submitted and tests completed then yes you would know they had already been tested against each other. Their new site no longer does this so it’s now a guessing game.
I have been working on UID cases for maybe three years now and have submitted probably 20 possible matches in that time across different cases. In maybe two of those I’ve had responses confirming that the match has already been checked and is not a match. In the others I’ve never had anything beyond that initial confirmation email. Some of those matches have a good chance in my opinion. So I guess things do move slowly and you’re also relying on the relevant law enforcement to follow up and pursue the match after namus passes that info on to them. Which may not always be a priority for old/low profile cases I’m guessing. It’s a long game for sure.
- Marks, Scars, Tattoos: Tattoo on the right ankle. She has "track marks" from heroine use. She may have a scar on her abdomen area and a tattoo on her lower right leg.
the area where the girl was found has a large population of native americans. the tribe is the lumbee tribe. they tend to keep to themselves.
sent from my iphone 12
Could it be possible she was native american?? That may help narrow down matches.
Does anyone have an up-to-date list of exclusions for LJD? I’ve been fascinated with her case recently, but I can’t find any recent updates about rule-outs. I’m especially curious about Teresa Cupps and Mary Frances Gregory — I think they have strong potential as matches. Anyway, it’s nice to see so many people looking for her and keeping her memory alive.
That explains why I haven’t been able to see them on NAMUS! Making an account now lol. Thanks for the reply!You would have to contact her law enforcement officers to get an official full list of ruleouts (besides the ones just listed on NamUs - because god knows they aren’t the same list!) but here is what is listed on NamUs. You can see it yourself by logging in, shame they put it behind a login now.
View attachment 220987
(I promise if you click it it’s not a thumbnail lol)