SherryLock
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2021
- Messages
- 471
- Reaction score
- 4,444
I agree. My best guess is it might be because it seems early reports are often incorrect, especially when only one source says something and/or no name is attached to the person who gave that information. Here, we have both of those things. They also said it was from early indications only, not for sure that it was the body of an older man. So I think it may or may not be accurate information.Thought it would be good to highlight this point. Guess I wonder, why there is so much speculation regarding Madalina, when they make this statement:
ABC affiliate WSOC reached out to Cornelius Police Department, which is the agency leading the search for Madalina, to see if there was any connection. A spokesperson for the police department said that while the newly uncovered remains had not yet been identified, early indications pointed to them belonging to an older man.
Cornelius police address speculation after human remains found in Madison County
The Federal Bureau of Investigation on Monday said that human remains were found in a rural area of Madison County.www.wsoctv.com
The other possibility, in my opinion, is just that not every poster keeps up on events of a case thoroughly before participating in the discussion. For ex. we often see a news article re-posted several times as if it's new information when it's already been posted and discussed for days on here. And I'm sure I've been guilty of this myself lol. MOO
Last edited: