NC - Shaniya Davis, 5, Fayetteville, 10 Nov 2009 - Allegedly sold by mother #26

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am aware of how the GAL system works. I just couldn't confirm for the poster asking the question IF every state has GAL's, but clearly indicated that I felt all the states had GAL's.

Sorry, did not mean to imply you did not know. Just to confirm that yes- every state has a GAL program; but every state runs them differently according to attorney/volunteer/ or attorney AND volunteer- usually according to caseload.
 
DSS records are privileged and not open. It is for the benefit of all children that those records be kept privet, so in order for LE to see what is in the records they do have to get a formal permission to do so.


It's my opinion keeping children's DSS records sealed doesn't benefit the child. It protects DSS and all their mistakes.
 
bump, I want Shaniya to be on the front page........not lost.
To us she is still so important!
Justice for this baby and others that are abused like her!
 
It's my opinion keeping children's DSS records sealed doesn't benefit the child. It protects DSS and all their mistakes.

IMHO I have seen it work both ways. DSS protecting themselves... as well as DSS protecting children from neglectful and/or abusive situations. That's why the GAL idea exists. Their singular purpose is in protecting the child SPECIFICALLY and ONLY. GAL's sign a legal agreement to put aside all efforts, concerns, etc except for the benefit of the child(ren) they are assigned.

Someone, somewhere has the records of this situation, of that much I am certain. As to whether or not the records are accurate.... that remains to be seen. Would not surprise me either way, but there is no way to verify that barring hearsay.
 
IMHO I have seen it work both ways. DSS protecting themselves... as well as DSS protecting children from neglectful and/or abusive situations. That's why the GAL idea exists. Their singular purpose is in protecting the child SPECIFICALLY and ONLY. GAL's sign a legal agreement to put aside all efforts, concerns, etc except for the benefit of the child(ren) they are assigned.

Someone, somewhere has the records of this situation, of that much I am certain. As to whether or not the records are accurate.... that remains to be seen. Would not surprise me either way, but there is no way to verify that barring hearsay.

IMHO they should have had those records right away with a subpoena.
BY NOW those records IMHO have been altered.
IT SHOULD ALSO BE that at the end of each visit they writ a report and time clock it so it can not be changed at all.
 
It's my opinion keeping children's DSS records sealed doesn't benefit the child. It protects DSS and all their mistakes.
IN this particular case you may actually be correct...BUT that is not the reason for keeping a record sealed.
If a child has a prostitute, or drug addicted parent, remember this child still has to live in the world at large, schools, vocation, etc.... those kind of records can only harm a child and should be privet.
 
Does anybody know why?

IMO, usually because they either have a conflict of interest (or other personal reasons) or because the DA is changing charges... or because it is a capital case.
 
According to the article, the lawyer said the state defender office could provide MAM more resources than he could to work the case.
I imagine more investigators, or more technicians of different kinds :waitasec:
That is good because when he gets the DP we do not need some BS about him not being represented properly.
 
I imagine more investigators, or more technicians of different kinds :waitasec:
That is good because when he gets the DP we do not need some BS about him not being represented properly.

Yep. That's my thought anyway.
 
I imagine more investigators, or more technicians of different kinds :waitasec:
That is good because when he gets the DP we do not need some BS about him not being represented properly.

Absolutely!! If either one of these two squirms out of this one because of some technicality, thats when Ill be carted away...I dont think I could take anymore!!!:crazy::crazy:
 
Shaniya Davis Case Update: Mario McNeill Dec. 9 court appearance, future date has been set

<<<SNIP>>>
Mario McNeill will return to court on January 20, 2010 surrounding the kidnapping charges. The criminal division on the Cumberland County Courthouse has updated their system this afternoon offering details on the next date Mario McNeill will appear over the rape and murder charges. That court date will be January 27, 2010 in courtroom 2B at the Cumberland County Courthouse.

<<<SNOP>>> more at the link.

http://www.examiner.com/x-17800-Ral...-Update--Mario-McNeill-Dec-9-court-appearance
 
Shaniya Davis Case Update: Mario McNeill Dec. 9 court appearance, future date has been set

<<<SNIP>>>
Mario McNeill will return to court on January 20, 2010 surrounding the kidnapping charges. The criminal division on the Cumberland County Courthouse has updated their system this afternoon offering details on the next date Mario McNeill will appear over the rape and murder charges. That court date will be January 27, 2010 in courtroom 2B at the Cumberland County Courthouse.

<<<SNOP>>> more at the link.

Yes tx I noticed that today on the court calendar and was disappointed. :( But I suppose having new atty assigned was partly the reason. The other article explains lawyer from NC Office of the Capital Defender would be assigned to the case as their office handles capital cases for indigent.

:parrot:
 
Its too bad that the lawyers defending MAM and using great resources to do so are at taxpayer expense. Who wants their taxes used to defend a child rapist and murderer?
(Assuming that he is guilty.)
 
HeadExplodes, an amen back...... and also, human trafficking is rampant in a multitude of different ways. Adults, bad enough. Children such as Shaniya... no words for that.

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/21912782/detail.html

I made a thread for this here.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4544173#post4544173"]Minister Wife Charged- Human Trafficking - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

I was so furious to read this article....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
187
Guests online
254
Total visitors
441

Forum statistics

Threads
608,606
Messages
18,242,291
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top