NC - Shaniya Davis, 5, Fayetteville, 10 Nov 2009 - Allegedly sold by mother #26

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps I ought to clarify or be more specific, it is according to MD--a family member--that previous DSS investigation was exclusive to or limited solely to the brother. As I said, I've seen other reports to the contrary.

:parrot:

You are right, The investigation was for the child that was living with her which means the brother only.
Shaniya was not there full time anyway so there was nothing to investigate yet........
I do wonder where the boy is now. He was taken by social Services, and placed.
BUT I know that child will be questioned, and while he may have been taught not to tell anything to anyone,
by now a professional has more then likely gotten some information.

OK so they are keeping that close to the vest too....:waitasec:
Just hope the boy is OK...
 
This O/T but I am new here and not sure where to post or ask this question. Can anyone point me the direction of PMing here? It IS about Shaniya so in that sense...not totally O/T Thanks..... and mea culpa mods.
2 ways to PM
On the far
right on the top you will see your name
welcome and privet messages.
go into privet messages and you will find a mail box you can send a PM (privet message to anyone, just know their user name)
ALSO: if you wanted to send one to me just click on my name on any post and you will see a drop, it will say send song line a PM or read posts by Songline etc...)
so you can either go into the mailbox or directly into someones name. (hope it helps)
 
You are right, The investigation was for the child that was living with her which means the brother only.
Shaniya was not there full time anyway so there was nothing to investigate yet........
I do wonder where the boy is now. He was taken by social Services, and placed.
BUT I know that child will be questioned, and while he may have been taught not to tell anything to anyone,
by now a professional has more then likely gotten some information.

OK so they are keeping that close to the vest too....:waitasec:
Just hope the boy is OK...

I hope so also. I'm curoius if anyone knows if the person who initially made the report was a mandated reporter... or a private individual or family member. I know that info is secure, but I am curious to know.
 
2 ways to PM
On the far
right on the top you will see your name
welcome and privet messages.
go into privet messages and you will find a mail box you can send a PM (privet message to anyone, just know their user name)
ALSO: if you wanted to send one to me just click on my name on any post and you will see a drop, it will say send song line a PM or read posts by Songline etc...)
so you can either go into the mailbox or directly into someones name. (hope it helps)

Thank you songline. Got it figured out I think. :)
 
Perhaps I ought to clarify or be more specific, it is according to MD--a family member--that previous DSS investigation was exclusive to or limited solely to the brother. As I said, I've seen other reports to the contrary.

:parrot:

I have read the news article where the LE "spokesperson" stated including Shaniya. IMO, if this was true, we would have heard it from the mouth of Brad or Aunt Carey.
 
You are right, The investigation was for the child that was living with her which means the brother only.
Shaniya was not there full time anyway so there was nothing to investigate yet........
I do wonder where the boy is now. He was taken by social Services, and placed.
BUT I know that child will be questioned, and while he may have been taught not to tell anything to anyone,
by now a professional has more then likely gotten some information.

OK so they are keeping that close to the vest too....:waitasec:
Just hope the boy is OK...

You may have misunderstood my post, just to be clear what I am saying is that we have only MD--afaik he appears to be the sole source, actually, of reports-- saying that when AD was previously investigated by DSS there were only issues around older bro and that no concerns had ever been raised re his younger sister Shaniya. I am saying it's only one person's version, not info given by LE nor any official source in the investigation--which IMO is likely LE's reason now for insisting SBI get involved so they can see for themselves exactly what was in fact documented.

It isn't in BL's interest to acknowledge having known of these issues. While other family members--including CDL--admit having concerns re Shaniya and knowing that AD neglected her children, others prefer to deny knowledge and dismiss allegations that there had ever been prior concerns reported to DSS specifically re Shaniya and that those went unheeded and ignored. It would make BL's role reprehensible thus I'm sure he would rather not own up to such a thing. I believe there were concerns raised about her welfare. Why have we heard others saying eg Shaniya 'wasn't even supposed to be there' with AD eg? JMO


:parrot:
 
I have read the news article where the LE "spokesperson" stated including Shaniya. IMO, if this was true, we would have heard it from the mouth of Brad or Aunt Carey.

I'll go w LE... unless they have the last name Davis lol.

:parrot:
 
I'll go w LE... unless they have the last name Davis lol.

:parrot:

Well, this was the "female spokeperson" for LE, of which, I don't give much credit to this spokesperson based on her early comments regarding MAM when they first had the video of MAM carrying Shaniya.

And to add, it was the media who wrote the article indicating the "spokesperson" said "including Shaniya" and we all know the media doesn't always get it right. And perhaps, the media also got the date wrong when Aunt Carey said "she dropped Shaniya off on October 31st and received a phone call stating "Antoinette indicating Aunt Carey would never see Shaniya again."

So I'll go back to the family knowing that DSS ONLY investigated Shaniya's brother. IF DSS did investigate Shaniya during the time DSS investigated Shaniya's brother and mother, then I will most certainly say " I was wrong."
 
Wow; police are questioning if DSS handed over all the files.

Wonder what they think DSS isn't sharing?

DSS might be thinking they don't know what to do.

That's why I was asking about the reporting. In my experience, if a mandated reporter reports to DSS that they are concerned about a child and/or children in a household, they investigate all the children in the home. If not a mandated reporter....they take their time and do the cursury follow-up.

Is anyone else with me on this?
 
O/T had to stay at a similiar motel last night........
As I waited for the elevator (looked exactly like that one)
I went up to the very quiet 2 nd floor and all I could think of was
Shaniya!!!
 
Well, this was the "female spokeperson" for LE, of which, I don't give much credit to this spokesperson based on her early comments regarding MAM when they first had the video of MAM carrying Shaniya.

And to add, it was the media who wrote the article indicating the "spokesperson" said "including Shaniya" and we all know the media doesn't always get it right. And perhaps, the media also got the date wrong when Aunt Carey said "she dropped Shaniya off on October 31st and received a phone call stating "Antoinette indicating Aunt Carey would never see Shaniya again."

So I'll go back to the family knowing that DSS ONLY investigated Shaniya's brother. IF DSS did investigate Shaniya during the time DSS investigated Shaniya's brother and mother, then I will most certainly say " I was wrong."

Sounds like you've decided neither LE, nor reporters, can be believed so choosing instead to place confidence in one family member. Personally I need to wait either for some confirmation (independent of MD or family), or until I'm told differently by LE--a correction, clarification or preferably some sort of update following the SBI investigation. JMO :)

:parrot:
 
Sounds like you've decided neither LE, nor reporters, can be believed so choosing instead to place confidence in one family member. Personally I need to wait either for some confirmation (independent of MD or family), or until I'm told differently by LE--a correction, clarification or preferably some sort of update following the SBI investigation. JMO :)

:parrot:


I didn't say I didn't believe LE or reporters. I clearly wrote about the "female" spokesperson for LE and what she verbally communicated about MAM to the press. If you recall, it didn't come across as being "urgent" or fear that MAM would harm Shaniya.

There was a DSS investigation, the family members confirmed there was a DSS investigation, Brad mentioned he heard something about the DSS investigation but didn't know everything. So YUP, I believe the family members regarding the DSS investigation being for Shaniya's brother under the mother's care.

The reporters have reported stuff in many cases that have yet to be confirmed or ever spoken again. I'll repeat, the media reported about what Aunt Carey "allegedly" said: "I dropped Shaniya off on October 31, 2009, with two days worth of clothes. Antoinette called me on Sunday and told me I wouldn't see Shaniya again."

We all have discussed the October 31st drop off and the phone call from AD to Carey, however, it has never been discussed ever again in the newspapers, on TV etc. :waitasec: Sure makes one wonder if the media got it wrong! :crazy:

I believe the "men in blue" and I carefully read all articles and look for the word "sources", and check other articles to see if they are reporting what the other ones are reporting.
 
I didn't say I didn't believe LE or reporters. I clearly wrote about the "female" spokesperson for LE and what she verbally communicated about MAM to the press. If you recall, it didn't come across as being "urgent" or fear that MAM would harm Shaniya.

There was a DSS investigation, the family members confirmed there was a DSS investigation, Brad mentioned he heard something about the DSS investigation but didn't know everything. So YUP, I believe the family members regarding the DSS investigation being for Shaniya's brother under the mother's care.

The reporters have reported stuff in many cases that have yet to be confirmed or ever spoken again. I'll repeat, the media reported about what Aunt Carey "allegedly" said: "I dropped Shaniya off on October 31, 2009, with two days worth of clothes. Antoinette called me on Sunday and told me I wouldn't see Shaniya again."

We all have discussed the October 31st drop off and the phone call from AD to Carey, however, it has never been discussed ever again in the newspapers, on TV etc. :waitasec: Sure makes one wonder if the media got it wrong! :crazy:

I believe the "men in blue" and I carefully read all articles and look for the word "sources", and check other articles to see if they are reporting what the other ones are reporting.

Ok pardon me you disbelieve LE spokesperson and reporters lol you're welcome to believe whomever you choose! I'm just not prepared to discount all of the people I would need to (TA, CL, even CDL herself, among others) in order to make this believable. Why wasn't Shaniya supposed to be over there? So for the time being, as I stated, in the absence of any correction, retraction or further clarification by LE, like them, I'm anxiously awaiting the findings of the SBI investigation. Obviously they believe someone has some 'splaining to do--and so do I. JMO :)

:parrot:
 
Wow; police are questioning if DSS handed over all the files.

Wonder what they think DSS isn't sharing?


Shaniya was at her mothers for 4-5 weeks which is plenty of time for someone to call DSS and for them to go to the mobile to check out the compliant. Maybe they were there when both of the kids were there. I can't imagine why DSS would be getting checked out if Shaniya wasn't involved as she is the one that is dead.
 
You may have misunderstood my post, just to be clear what I am saying is that we have only MD--afaik he appears to be the sole source, actually, of reports-- saying that when AD was previously investigated by DSS there were only issues around older bro and that no concerns had ever been raised re his younger sister Shaniya. I am saying it's only one person's version, not info given by LE nor any official source in the investigation--which IMO is likely LE's reason now for insisting SBI get involved so they can see for themselves exactly what was in fact documented.
It isn't in BL's interest to acknowledge having known of these issues. While other family members--including CDL--admit having concerns re Shaniya and knowing that AD neglected her children, others prefer to deny knowledge and dismiss allegations that there had ever been prior concerns reported to DSS specifically re Shaniya and that those went unheeded and ignored. It would make BL's role reprehensible thus I'm sure he would rather not own up to such a thing. I believe there were concerns raised about her welfare. Why have we heard others saying eg Shaniya 'wasn't even supposed to be there' with AD eg? JMO


:parrot:
We are on the same page and I understood your post completely...
I also do wonder where and how the boy is now.

Another topic is that BL and CDL will not acknowledge knowing much of anything it is not in their interest. I know that too and agree; that is what makes me furious with BOTH of them. IMHO they knew plenty.

As for LE they were not privileged to the information SBI had on record before now, and they are right to look into it.
 
Perhaps I ought to clarify or be more specific, it is according to MD--a family member--that previous DSS investigation was exclusive to or limited solely to the brother. As I said, I've seen other reports to the contrary.

:parrot:
IMHO it was limited to the brother because he was there full time. SD was there rarely. I imagine who ever called for a DSS inspection may not have even known about Shaniya.
 
O/T had to stay at a similiar motel last night........
As I waited for the elevator (looked exactly like that one)
I went up to the very quiet 2 nd floor and all I could think of was
Shaniya!!!
How long did it take you to fall asleep ? :innocent:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
198
Guests online
268
Total visitors
466

Forum statistics

Threads
608,574
Messages
18,241,783
Members
234,402
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top