FunkyMonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2016
- Messages
- 346
- Reaction score
- 2,493
I agree, but money talks, etc. (And if this woman is indeed a victim of PPP, I ask the world to forgive what I'm saying.)
I feel that what she did, from beginning to end, was just too pat, too "complete" and thought-out to have been hatched from a psychotic mind (speaking as someone who knows very little about PPP). Certainly, her scenario needed a bit more polish, but it was plausible.
We've seen doctors and other professionals do a job on the jury, especially if big bucks for paid experts are involved in some defenses. It could happen.
The prosecution does have resources as well and the reliable point/counterpoint is what it's all about in the courtroom.
I don't see a plea being offered by either side at any time -- IMO, this one will go to trial.
But if she was in her right mind and intending to kill her baby, why not kill the baby? Why toss her down an embankment in a car seat? Just doesn’t seem rational if we are talking about premeditated murder. Not excusing any of it, just think she is way off in some way.