Seattle1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 41,639
- Reaction score
- 432,899
I won't be surprised if we never learn what his motive was.
Agree. Nobody seems to know, and County Attorney wants public to know motives are not necessary for convictions in criminal cases.
Motive eludes police as RJR homicide investigation probes Facebook accounts, bank records
[...]
Burleigh County State's Attorney Julie Lawyer, speaking on general terms with no detailed knowledge of Isaak's case, said motives are not necessary for convictions in criminal cases. She referenced a jury instruction that says "proof of a motive for commission of a crime is permissible and often valuable, but never essential."
"It's not that we are required to prove it, but it can be helpful to the jury if that's there, if they have doubt as to the person doing it," Lawyer said.
No motive was proven in the murder case against Morris Brickle-Hicks, whom a Burleigh County jury convicted in 2017 for the fatal beating of Misty Coffelt.
"We have no idea to this day why he did it," Lawyer said.
Aaron Birst, a former Cass County prosecutor and now executive director of the North Dakota State's Attorneys' Association, said juries are naturally curious about a defendant's motivation in a crime, but prosecutors foremost rely on evidence.
"Ultimately what you're proving to the jury is what they call the essential elements of the offense, and that's just 'Did this thing happen, yes or no?'" Birst said.