Snick1946
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,626
- Reaction score
- 337
The fact that nothing was taken from the house in this case is HUGE to me. This makes it appear to be more of a rage, revenge or hired killing.
And with the relatively short span of time from the time Tom got home until his father got home makes that even more apparent to me. Someone went there with the purpose of getting even for something.
If only we had some suspects to even consider, but Omaha PD nor the family have given out any crumbs about suspects that might help jog people's memories.
FBI profilers told OPD they felt the perp was in all probability a transient serial killer. By that I assume they meant an individual who travels widely and who could live many miles away and of whom friends, neighbors and even family have no knowledge of this. He could have a family whom he told he was going on a business trip, or he may even have been on such a trip. It occurs to me that we have assumed all along a personal motive based on the violence of the crime.
Put yourself for a moment if possible in the mind of such a person. You see an 11 year old boy you don't know; what would make you that angry? Couldn't the thought of something terrible that happened to YOU at that age and the desire to eradicate it by killing that image of yourself? Killing Shirlee could have been part of the delusion, killing a mother image.
This guy could have come into Omaha earlier in the week and driven around looking for victims that fit his need. He sees Tom get off the bus one afternoon and makes a note of the time, maybe he sees him enter the house alone so knows he's a latchkey kid. Probably he didn't know he'd run into another person but that worked out. He's killed before; he knows how to entice his way into a house.
I have often tried to look for cases with a similar MO, my research skills may not be the best. Anyway it's all worth some thought..