Found Deceased NE - Sydney Loofe, 24, Lincoln, 15 Nov 2017 #1

[Monaural Binkie]

This says they "were arrested" on unrelated charges.
(but it is huffington post, hopefully allowed and correct)

ETA- No one has said Sydney is dead, she is missing. Why does he say killed?



https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5a21cacfe4b0a02abe9135c4

He says he never killed anybody because he is , he says, addressing all of the rumours and accusations made in comments they have read on social media.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[Monaural Binkie]

She also had on those large sunglasses - for someone who is allegedly innocent, she sure took a lot of care to hide her appearance!

I think the sunglasses were to hide the bleached eyebrows. [emoji41]

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[freefallzzzz]

Earlier searched areas
"Police and sheriff's deputies from Saline County along with Lincoln Police were on scene at multiple locations in and around Wilber. One was just northwest of the high school. The other was along County Road 2000, near the Turkey Creek"
http://www.1011now.com/content/news...ely-searching-for-Sydney-Loofe-460846333.html
(I cannot get maps to link in here but look at that area 40.460395,-97.008277 )

 

[Shiressleuth]

The difference between smoking regular weed and extracts through conventional methods is based on personal experience. The difference between either of the above and smoking a dab rig is based on a number of friends I have who have done so, some of which have done it just a couple times and a couple who smoke dabs regularly.

In any case, if it came across like I was disputing the article's accuracy, I apologize. That wasn't my intention. I do think the article is generally accurate, it's just oversimplified.

As to the question of driving, that's a pretty weird issue and legal marijuana is new enough that it hasn't really been sorted out. Some states have an actual THC level test (I think a blood test?) for drivers, but as you said, daily smokers would be unlikely to pass the test due to residual THC in their system. (The "threshold" isn't zero THC, but it's low enough that daily smokers would be highly likely to be over the line even if they hadn't smoked that day). So it's a really tricky issue. I'm not a daily smoker, nor do I drive when I'm high, so thankfully I don't really have to worry about it.

I think the way it's typically enforced is if someone a.) can't pass a field sobriety test (and I think they have ones specific to drugs that are different from a standard alcohol field sobriety test) AND b.) is found to have marijuana in their system, then they get a DUI. In this particular case, I'm very confident that Bailey would have been driving illegally.

Thanks dub for the additional info. It's another reason to disbelieve BB's statement she dropped S at a friend's house IMO.

 

[Monaural Binkie]

I might run if a woman I went on a date with disappeared, and everyone assumed I was involved. I might even run if I was innocent, especially if I'd previously been harassed by the cops, and/or knew people in jail who were innocent. Or the police around there was corrupt. They turned themselves in, after running. That may be exactly what I'd do - panic and run, think about what to do, then turn myself in. None of us know what we'd do in this situation unless we've been in it. MOO.

I'm guessing you wouldn't have set up a fake identity to go on the date in the first place though...

And you might not make videos of yourself addressing the case (but really only talking about how hard done by you are)?
If you did run, and you did make a video to try and clear your name, I think the FIRST thing you would do would be to clearly state exactly where you last saw Sydney. They made three videos and failed to do this once.
LE have confirmed that despite saying they might in their video, they did not actually turn themselves it.

I really don't think this was the kind of run you might do in this case. I think this was the criminal kind.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 

[Shiressleuth]

LE hasn't addressed this directly via MSM however given that these towns are small, local LE manpower may be limited. Also, take into account there are several counties involved which would allow the Omaha FBI to cast a wider net with technology and other resources. The closest statement from LE regarding the FBI is in this article



BB is being held on a failure to appear warrant out of Lincoln, NE and AT is being held on a 'sealed warrant' for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. They have posted videos saying they're being hunted when in reality they are running. BB states she was with SL the last time law enforcement has been able to confirm her whereabouts.

The US Marshalls are the ones who escorted these 2 back to NE so I'm tempted to give weight to the Federal officials because they have more details and information than what is being stated via MSM.

If these 2 are really innocent then ask yourself, why were they running? :thinking:

I'm am very happy they have been detained but after listening to the FBI guy in that 30 minute video am still none the wiser, but if they can hold them for 72 hours while they investigate them, all well and good.

 

[Shiressleuth]

Court documents show an arrest warrant had been filed for Trail by Saline County authorities on Nov. 21 for possession of a deadly weapon by a prohibited person. The incident took place in September.

The documents also show Trail has two previous convictions. He was sentenced to 2-5 years for second-degree forgery, and 30-54 months for issuing a bad check.

Boswell has a possession of a marijuana charge against her, according to court records. She received the charge for possession of less than 1 ounce in April of 2016.

In addition, a bench warrant was issued for Boswell for failure to appear in court.

http://www.1011now.com/content/news...deo-about-Loofe-disappearance--460783163.html

Between being the last to admittedly be with Sydney and the above, this is why they are being detained.

So why the forensics suits? For those two charges alone they would not have been detained by the Feds or have had to give up their clothes for testing. I think the arrest will come. AJMO.

 

[MissMalowe]

I might run if a woman I went on a date with disappeared, and everyone assumed I was involved. I might even run if I was innocent, especially if I'd previously been harassed by the cops, and/or knew people in jail who were innocent. Or the police around there was corrupt. They turned themselves in, after running. That may be exactly what I'd do - panic and run, think about what to do, then turn myself in. None of us know what we'd do in this situation unless we've been in it. MOO.

BBM
They did not turn themselves in.

 

[LisaWL7TR]

He says he never killed anybody because he is , he says, addressing all of the rumours and accusations made in comments they have read on social media.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

Well that also...but he appears to be a con man. Imho i guess we wait and see.

 

[SpanishMossAntiques]

In the video Bailey says, "I'm truly sorry" - then qualifies that with a weak, "and I didn't have anything to do with this". I've conducted a lot of forensic interviews in my life, and her statement really bothers me. If she had nothing to do with Sydney's disappearance, then what is she sorry for? When I've interviewed people who were innocent of what I was accusing them of, I'd get a strong response like, "hey, I hope she's found soon, and I had absolutely NOTHING to do with her disappearance; I really hope you get the FBI involved and every police officer in the county involved in looking for her". It's also interesting that Trail is hiding in maybe the back seat, and Bailey is wearing those large sunglasses; as such, you cannot see either POI's eyes (only Trail's left eye, which he's squinting) - and the eyes are always something an interviewer wants to see, as they often betray a subject's words. It's also very concerning that Bailey used an alias for her date - I suspect she and Trail might have been 'trolling' for women for a while, as nothing about this case feels random at all. Just MOO.

 

[Shiressleuth]

Well that also...but he appears to be a con man. Imho i guess we wait and see.

At the very least they are withholding info where S was dropped off. Why not say exactly where that was? Even if they didn't know the friend or the exact address they could so easily have disclosed where, in their numerous FB videos. Who are they protecting if they are innocent?

 

[LisaWL7TR]

At the very least they are withholding info where S was dropped off. Why not say exactly where that was? Even if they didn't know the friend or the exact address they could so easily have disclosed where, in their numerous FB videos. Who are they protecting if they are innocent?

I agree.

 

[Shiressleuth]

In the video Bailey says, "I'm truly sorry" - then qualifies that with a weak, "and I didn't have anything to do with this". I've conducted a lot of forensic interviews in my life, and her statement really bothers me. If she had nothing to do with Sydney's disappearance, then what is she sorry for? When I've interviewed people who were innocent of what I was accusing them of, I'd get a strong response like, "hey, I hope she's found soon, and I had absolutely NOTHING to do with her disappearance; I really hope you get the FBI involved and every police officer in the county involved in looking for her". It's also interesting that Trail is hiding in maybe the back seat, and Bailey is wearing those large sunglasses; as such, you cannot see either POI's eyes (only Trail's left eye, which he's squinting) - and the eyes are always something an interviewer wants to see, as they often betray a subject's words. It's also very concerning that Bailey used an alias for her date - I suspect she and Trail might have been 'trolling' for women for a while, as nothing about this case feels random at all. Just MOO.

Completely agree. I even thought they both looked like they were in the rear seats so could have had someone else with them JMO.
(Or it could be a two seater like a pick up truck for example?)

 

[therion20]

At the very least they are withholding info where S was dropped off. Why not say exactly where that was? Even if they didn't know the friend or the exact address they could so easily have disclosed where, in their numerous FB videos. Who are they protecting if they are innocent?

I have a crazy theory that they left Sidney with someone else, meaning a drug dealer or some guy they owed money to. That's if is true that they have nothing to do with her disappearance. And that's a big if.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

 

[Committed_algorithms]

 

[JerseyGirl]

So why the forensics suits? For those two charges alone they would not have been detained by the Feds or have had to give up their clothes for testing. I think the arrest will come. AJMO.

I image the forensic suits were because all of their clothes are being tested.

I have a crazy theory that they left Sidney with someone else, meaning a drug dealer or some guy they owed money to. That's if is true that they have nothing to do with her disappearance. And that's a big if.

I agree, I think that's the hope of LE when the suggest she may be alive.

 

[Cherry]

Omg Kaykayy you are one of us, so glad to see that put to rest! I haven't read back entire thread and wanted to say welcome anyways and don't shot me lol!
I am waiting for LE to crack this case and don't think the two arrested will admit the time of day. Grrrrrr.

 

[LadyL]

[bbm]

your job fascinates me! maybe you could become verified so that we can rely on you as an expert?

In the video Bailey says, "I'm truly sorry" - then qualifies that with a weak, "and I didn't have anything to do with this". I've conducted a lot of forensic interviews in my life, and her statement really bothers me. If she had nothing to do with Sydney's disappearance, then what is she sorry for? When I've interviewed people who were innocent of what I was accusing them of, I'd get a strong response like, "hey, I hope she's found soon, and I had absolutely NOTHING to do with her disappearance; I really hope you get the FBI involved and every police officer in the county involved in looking for her". It's also interesting that Trail is hiding in maybe the back seat, and Bailey is wearing those large sunglasses; as such, you cannot see either POI's eyes (only Trail's left eye, which he's squinting) - and the eyes are always something an interviewer wants to see, as they often betray a subject's words. It's also very concerning that Bailey used an alias for her date - I suspect she and Trail might have been 'trolling' for women for a while, as nothing about this case feels random at all. Just MOO.

 

[MelbourneSleuth]

In the video Bailey says, "I'm truly sorry" - then qualifies that with a weak, "and I didn't have anything to do with this". I've conducted a lot of forensic interviews in my life, and her statement really bothers me. If she had nothing to do with Sydney's disappearance, then what is she sorry for? When I've interviewed people who were innocent of what I was accusing them of, I'd get a strong response like, "hey, I hope she's found soon, and I had absolutely NOTHING to do with her disappearance; I really hope you get the FBI involved and every police officer in the county involved in looking for her". It's also interesting that Trail is hiding in maybe the back seat, and Bailey is wearing those large sunglasses; as such, you cannot see either POI's eyes (only Trail's left eye, which he's squinting) - and the eyes are always something an interviewer wants to see, as they often betray a subject's words. It's also very concerning that Bailey used an alias for her date - I suspect she and Trail might have been 'trolling' for women for a while, as nothing about this case feels random at all. Just MOO.

Very interesting post!
Sorry my first post in thread, and still catching up [emoji1430]

I’ve had an uneasy gut feeling that these two have operated together for sometime, setting up women and may be end up being investigated for other crimes or possibly past victims may come forward. Possibly another reason for early Federal LE involvement? MOO.
Praying for Sydney [emoji1431]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Harikari]

"I'm truly sorry" could easily be "I'm truly sorry that she's missing, or that her family is going through hell, or just a general statement". Again, I can imagine myself saying that, especially if I'd had no sleep for days and 95% of people were calling me guilty - and they could also be on drugs, or withdrawing from them. If you're going through everything they say with a fine tooth comb, then yes, it's a small red flag - but imo, not more than that - especially given their mental states right now. If an intelligent, educated and very thoughtful person - who wasn't exhausted etc. said "I'm sorry, and I had nothing to do with it" - well, then I'd say the flag would be a bit bigger, and more red. MOO