GrilledCheezy
Creepin' on the interwebs
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2014
- Messages
- 554
- Reaction score
- 1,357
Wow. A 26 minute interview with AT? Aaaand this just got even more peculiar.
I'll bet his attorney is just thrilled with that development.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow. A 26 minute interview with AT? Aaaand this just got even more peculiar.
I'll bet his attorney is just thrilled with that development.
I thought that was strange as well. In this article a PA State Trooper said that AT had used a false name. It also says they used a bank account actually in BB's name.
http://beatricedailysun.com/news/lo...cle_7ee494df-d07a-5b5b-a021-b1fdd50e50e6.html
I wonder if it's been only recently that PA courts discovered who he actually is. If they tried to verify the name AT used it would have checked out superficially, it's a real person. I would think this would have probably been figured out if they tried to actually issue a warrant for this person. Honestly, this should have been figured out when BB was being held in Decatur County Iowa jail since that is her hometown and the hometown of the name AT falsely gave.
In Iowa, there was no bondsman used, it was a straight up cash bond but no amount was listed. Not sure what the typical bond amount for "fugitive of justice" or if it goes according to the state of extradition. There is also no interested party listed. This is extremely odd because Iowa court files will list either the bonding agent or an interested party, the name of person who came in to pay cash. Once a case is disposed or dismissed in Iowa, a document is also usually filed showing how the bond is handled. But there's absolutely no further detail. The way it appears in the document flow, is that the cash bond she posted in Iowa was allowed to transfer directly to PA.
So in both states nobody had to sign for her? Even if she used a bonding agent in PA and they allowed her to sign for herself (which is rare imo) certainly they would have required proof of her assets or verified stable employment. I would think at this point the only ally she had is AT. This thing is so peculiar.
Iowa
PA
It seems impossible for AT to zip it. I hope LJS releases the entirety of that call. I have been following a brutal murder case of a young girl in New Mexico and they actually released several calls between the suspects and their visitors. I was quite shocked as the trials haven't even started.
"I am not an innocent party in many things, but don’t try to hang other people because of things I have done,” said Trail...
"I am not an innocent party in many things, but don’t try to hang other people because of things I have done,” said Trail...
Here's a link to the Lincoln Journal Star article on AT's interview:
http://journalstar.com/news/local/9...cle_a73ed0ba-49dd-5f6a-983a-cd8d4b085ace.html
Zach Pluhacek
@zachami
Cuts against the rumor mill re:# SydneyLoffe.
FBI tells @LJRileyJohnson
"nothing to suggest" case is tied to other deaths/disappearances.
what the hell does that mean?
From the LJS article:
In two phone calls lasting 26 minutes from the Saline County jail, Trail said Boswell, who has been accused of felonies but never convicted, had nothing to do with Loofe's death.
Charlie Manson said he had nothing to do with the Tate and LaBianca murders back in 1969. To that, the prosecutor, Vincent Bugliosi replied, that Charlie obviously didn't understand the concept of conspiracy.
JMO
This is the first I have ever seen a "person of interest" make phone calls to the press from jail.
AT is quite the character.