Found Deceased NE - Sydney Loofe, 24, Lincoln, 15 Nov 2017 #2

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes and it takes me back to Starkweather/Fugate, another one blamed on brainwashing... I still say they choose the path...
 
Yes and it takes me back to Starkweather/Fugate, another one blamed on brainwashing... I still say they choose the path...

Agree - and Charlie ended up throwing Caril under the bus, too. Caril's haughty attitude throughout the whole ordeal probably had as much to do with her conviction as anything. BB seems to have a similar attitude, IMO. I don't think it will bode well for her.
 
Agree - and Charlie ended up throwing Caril under the bus, too. Caril's haughty attitude throughout the whole ordeal probably had as much to do with her conviction as anything. BB seems to have a similar attitude, IMO. I don't think it will bode well for her.

I’ve heard in regards to LE, the first one to talk will get the better deal.

If B.B. isn’t involved (which I doubt) she needs to start talking or else things will not end up well for her....

AT seems like the type to show one face to the public and another behind closed doors such as he will defend her to the public in MSM interviews but I guarantee if it comes down his life or hers, he will throw her under the bus.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Agree - and Charlie ended up throwing Caril under the bus, too. Caril's haughty attitude throughout the whole ordeal probably had as much to do with her conviction as anything. BB seems to have a similar attitude, IMO. I don't think it will bode well for her.

The brainwashing is definitely at the surface level. The female counterparts in these duos made the choice to be there. And they do seem to have aloof demeanors throughout the legal proceedings. Interestingly, they end up being the free ones down the road. The Bernardo Homolka duo comes to mind. I will never be able to wrap my mind around Homolka being freed and allowed to have a new life and family.
 
This screen shot is a snip from PacerMonitor (also linked below). These notes were made by the court on Dec 22nd, pertaining to the Federal indictments. I am not 100% sure of the exact interpretation but it seems to relate to timeliness and/or extending the time-frame of speedy trial, and also the disclosure of evidence/testimonies between case parties. January 9th seems to be a key date.
attachment.php


These seem to be typical filings in state criminal cases but I am not sure if they hold the exact same meanings or if they are also typical of Federal fraud cases. Anyone who can expand or better explain, please do.


We are fast approaching the end of that " next few weeks" time-period regarding the expectation of charges being filed in SL's disappearance and death. I guess I am wondering if we will see any advancements in SL's case around Jan. 9th.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/23264933/USA_v_Trail_et_al


https://www.3newsnow.com/news/local...e-lawyer-anticipates-charges-to-be-filed-soon
 

Attachments

  • case-opinions.jpg
    case-opinions.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 101
  • case-opinions.jpg
    case-opinions.jpg
    37.5 KB · Views: 425
JMO
They seem to have excuses for everything but the thing is some of their excuses dont make any sense. One example is here about the bad check.
You are not supposed to write checks unless you know you have money in advance to cover the check. Not afterwards.
I doubt a jury would say this was not writing a bad check because someone else was supposed to put money in AFTER the check was written.

"For instance, he said that while Boswell faces charges of using a bad check in Pennsylvania to buy antique coins, Trail claimed that her check bounced because an antique buyer, a doctor, failed to deposit $25,000 in her bank account."

http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/aub...cle_9f4680c4-e78b-11e7-81c8-2f2e3f2f8c27.html
 
JMO
They seem to have excuses for everything but the thing is some of their excuses dont make any sense. One example is here about the bad check.
You are not supposed to write checks unless you know you have money in advance to cover the check. Not afterwards.
I doubt a jury would say this was not writing a bad check because someone else was supposed to put money in AFTER the check was written.

"For instance, he said that while Boswell faces charges of using a bad check in Pennsylvania to buy antique coins, Trail claimed that her check bounced because an antique buyer, a doctor, failed to deposit $25,000 in her bank account."

http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/aub...cle_9f4680c4-e78b-11e7-81c8-2f2e3f2f8c27.html

It is how manipulators talk. Everyone else is to blame.

jmo
 
It is how manipulators talk. Everyone else is to blame.

jmo

My thoughts are that the "doctor" who was supposed to deposit $25,000 in BB's bank account does not even exist and the stolen property they are accused of transporting by the feds was the loot they stole in PA.
 
I don't believe Aubrey when he said a doctor neglected to deposit $25,000 in BB's account, according to the pol-eece they were using a forged letter of credit from the bank.

Also, found this little update, not sure it was posted here:

AT acknowledged that Loofe had been in their apartment in Wilber, and that before the discovery of her body, he and Boswell had traveled west to York, “in the general area” of where the body was found.

http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/aub...cle_9f4680c4-e78b-11e7-81c8-2f2e3f2f8c27.html
 
I don't believe Aubrey when he said a doctor neglected to deposit $25,000 in BB's account, according to the pol-eece they were using a forged letter of credit from the bank.

Also, found this little update, not sure it was posted here:

AT acknowledged that Loofe had been in their apartment in Wilber, and that before the discovery of her body, he and Boswell had traveled west to York, “in the general area” of where the body was found.

http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/aub...cle_9f4680c4-e78b-11e7-81c8-2f2e3f2f8c27.html

IMO AT is doing damage control. I’m curious if that was the same evening they supposedly drove her back to Lincoln and dropped SL off at her friend’s house. I’m also curious about that lack of phone calls from AT to news outlets as of late.
 
"1011 NOW has reached out to the U.S. Marshall's Office who said they are unable to disclose information about Trail's whereabouts."

http://www.1011now.com/content/news...o-longer-at-Saline-County-Jail-468038023.html

A spokesman for the U.S. Marshal's Service confirmed Trail remains in their custody but wouldn't provide further information.

"The U.S. Marshals Service does not disclose any personal information, location held, court scheduling, transportation details or other inmate information, other than to verify an inmate is in federal custody," Deputy U.S. Marshal Carlos Najera said in an email.

Trail's attorney did not respond immediately on Thursday to a request for comment.

A spokesman for the FBI, which is leading the investigation, referred questions to the U.S. Marshals Service.


http://journalstar.com/news/local/9...cle_2d84d8e2-b445-532f-8c6d-76c31d55d8bf.html
 
Well, he was either taken to a court - though anyone who has PACER should be able to find a proceeding - or to another lockup elsewhere.
 
What if he was taken to a hospital?

:thinking:
 
What if he was taken to a hospital?

:thinking:

Medical and mental health reasons are possibilities. Especially with this super strange statement, "Trail's attorney Korey Reiman said he didn't know where his client was moved." What an extremely odd thing to say. I would have found it more rational if he said he preferred not to disclose it. Wouldn't it be difficult for a defendant to have effective counsel if the attorney doesn't know where the client is at? Unless it really is some type of emergency reason.

http://journalstar.com/news/local/9...cle_2d84d8e2-b445-532f-8c6d-76c31d55d8bf.html
 
They could of taken him to the Lincoln Federal facility for Diagnosis & Evaluation, to get a profile on him, or does that have to be under a court order?
 
or it could be they want to separate those two even further from each other...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
2,045
Total visitors
2,173

Forum statistics

Threads
605,399
Messages
18,186,502
Members
233,349
Latest member
JediKaty
Back
Top