MaxManning
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,438
- Reaction score
- 8
I'm going to say that right now, this beginning of the timeline aspect is very troubling to me.
Someone is lying or misremembering.
But, I find the dispatcher for Auto Trader who talks to halbach at 2:30-ish that she is on her way to the Junkyard as the most reliable in terms of a solid timeline. We know factually that the phone call took place and we have a clear accounting of where teresa's been up to that point.
The ONLY way I see the bus driver's account to be correct, is if something delayed Teresa Halbach. That delay could have been BEFORE she got to the property or AFTER she got to the property.
At the moment, I tend to believe that Steve's account on Nancy grace was true because it matches the Auto Trader account.
Doesn't mean that the bus driver is lying, but possibly misremembering. But I definitely would like to see the interview and know more about her potential relationships to people at the junkyard.
We know Steve called her phone at 4:35. What was the purpose of this call ? There could be a really good explanation. But it's suspicious to me, as he didn't use *67 for that call and he did for the others.
His call at 4:35 was after halbach's phone was deemed as off the network - turned off or destroyed potentially.
So hopefully the trial transcripts or an avery interview BEFORE the trial can shed light on if Avery gives an explanation. In the documentary there is video of Avery talking to the police in the same room that brendan was in for one interview at the police station. So we really need to see that interview. In that interview he also mentions the mysterious "Tammy".
My guess right now, is that Avery's defense and the people that made the documentary, would rather not that anyone see's that interview in it's entirety. Why ? I don't know. But not showing it, usually means you don't like what gets said there and it sheds too much light.
My question is whether or not that interview can be introduced as evidence to the trial ? Is it considered testifying against himself ? Does he have to agree to have that accepted as evidence ?
I think we need to see that interview. anyone ? transcript ? Anyone with the magic to make that happen, please do so!
Someone is lying or misremembering.
But, I find the dispatcher for Auto Trader who talks to halbach at 2:30-ish that she is on her way to the Junkyard as the most reliable in terms of a solid timeline. We know factually that the phone call took place and we have a clear accounting of where teresa's been up to that point.
The ONLY way I see the bus driver's account to be correct, is if something delayed Teresa Halbach. That delay could have been BEFORE she got to the property or AFTER she got to the property.
At the moment, I tend to believe that Steve's account on Nancy grace was true because it matches the Auto Trader account.
Doesn't mean that the bus driver is lying, but possibly misremembering. But I definitely would like to see the interview and know more about her potential relationships to people at the junkyard.
We know Steve called her phone at 4:35. What was the purpose of this call ? There could be a really good explanation. But it's suspicious to me, as he didn't use *67 for that call and he did for the others.
His call at 4:35 was after halbach's phone was deemed as off the network - turned off or destroyed potentially.
So hopefully the trial transcripts or an avery interview BEFORE the trial can shed light on if Avery gives an explanation. In the documentary there is video of Avery talking to the police in the same room that brendan was in for one interview at the police station. So we really need to see that interview. In that interview he also mentions the mysterious "Tammy".
My guess right now, is that Avery's defense and the people that made the documentary, would rather not that anyone see's that interview in it's entirety. Why ? I don't know. But not showing it, usually means you don't like what gets said there and it sheds too much light.
My question is whether or not that interview can be introduced as evidence to the trial ? Is it considered testifying against himself ? Does he have to agree to have that accepted as evidence ?
I think we need to see that interview. anyone ? transcript ? Anyone with the magic to make that happen, please do so!