But then they have to kill her, Burn her on his property right at his back door, Hide her car, Get into the house and put the key in there. They have to Move her burnt bones in two other places in Averys yard.
IT is incredulous at best.
The bones were not just found in the Quarry, Barrel and in the burn pit. There were also charred bones thrown around the grass surrounding the pit. This would mean, He killed her, burned her body in the fire pit (that is behind his garage in a wide open space), then after it cools he takes her bones a few over here and a few over there in the grass. Then gonna take these two and move them to the quarry and take these few to the barrel. Gonna clean up all her DNA from everywhere but her own car (not clean up his own blood but clean up his prints. drive the car and place it where it can be found. DOUBLE PARKED and covered with the big branch arrow and hood, HERE I AM. right over here. Then take the plates off and instead of burning them with the camera, and other belongings he's gonna bend them up and stick them in the back of this here station wagon closer to his place. (station wagon look in the back there and see the plates no trunk that I recall on any station wagon I've been in). Clean up every spent bullet fragment but one and leave all the shells on the ground. none of them have a speck of blood splatter or her DNA on them, Place those back on the floor. Then wash her key for some reason, then touch it with his own DNA and leave it in an open shelf without any mysterious doors or draws where if it was in there would have been easily found on the first day of searching. not 3 days and 7 entries. DNA found no where other than a questionable bullet fragment in his garage 4 months later. Evidence pictures also show someone had access to that garage between Nov and Mar. When they go back in march a red car is in there.
I want to know why it was ok to deviate from protocol, something rarely done in cases was done in almost all protocol with the Avery case?
From the "Recusal" or to "recuse" oneself means to remove oneself from participation in a decision so as avoid a conflict of interest.
They knew SA was already making statements on News Media about being targeted by the MCSD. That is why they removed themselves from the investigation.
They were to recuse themselves to avoid not only impropriety but even the appearance of impropriety. Yet the remained participating in the case. They did not avoid the appearance of impropriety when they continued to be heavily involved in the case. 3 Manitowoc officers to 1 Calumet officer per team. Sounds like Calumet had the lead of babysitting.
I would like to know what the Judges job is when he is included in making a decision of having a special prosecutor and another county take over the case. Should he now recuse himself from Judging anything coming out of the investigation? He was knowing about this sensitive conversation and investigation, that happened between The county Sheriffs office and the county's DA office about the appearance of impropriety. As he did know the officers of the county recused themselves and then also allowed that evidence that was collected from the county, does this make him at all faulty in his duties? Seems like one of the judges seems he should have stepped down as well but did not.
Then they deviate from the way one would usually collect bone evidence at a crime scene and just shoveled her around. That's very sad. They could have done a better job for all involved. Why they didn't just makes me think they couldn't cause they were hiding something.
Then they find this amazing bullet 4 months later and the DNA analyst contaminates it. They refused Defense opportunity to be there, for said contamination then she does it herself. then she DEVIATES from protocol. In any other case that evidence on the bullet that was never said to be Blood, was inconclusive. But hey ill just talk to these men in the investigation and file this deviation and tada magic bullet, magic DNA for court.
Just my thoughts and opinions.
