Deeptoad
Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2015
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 114
Because I believe A that he really had nothing to do with it, Or B that he only did what SA told him. I don't believe at all that this kid was a mastermind and went after TH. I don't believe his story of the murder in the trailer and sexual assault. Not by him.
By that, is it fair to assume that you would be in favor of a new trial for BD? If that were to happen, SA would be equally entitled to one as it was BD's coerced confession from which the prosecution built its case. Can we look at BD's conviction as a miscarriage of justice and not SA's? Because the two cases are so intertwined, that would be impossible.
So, I understand you think SA is guilty and I absolutely understand why. But, if BD isn't guilty, there's a serious problem with how conviction was brought for SA.
And, I think the majority of the folks on this thread find that the most upsetting thing in all of this. I certainly know I do.