RainCheck
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2014
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 257
The problem with all of this stuff is that, because of the corrupt behaviour of investigators and others in positions of trust and authority, it is not believable. There was a frame job going on. Almost everyone can acknowledge that. With that in mind, How can anything else brought forth be considered credible?
Once again, I don't claim to think any of it is valid. I'm only concerned it was left out of the documentary. People are extremely worked up over the documentary but it clearly left out some very important pieces the jury had to consider and I'm sure there's more. I thought I made it pretty clear the first time I posted all the information I felt Brendan was innocent. I felt Steven Avery might have some sort of involvement or possibly none at all. Ultimately I feel retrials are a no brainier, but I still think the documentary left out information they should not have.