SophieW1989
Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2019
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 53
This is a crime forum so surely people expect these details and understand how cases unravel though?
Just feels like there's a certain tilt on here which is very emotive. This has nothing to do with rape culture or whatever other buzz terminology people want to trot out. No one is blaming her for anything. She got in a silly position and of course the blame is on the accused if he is indeed guilty, but I don't get why people think it's so grubby her sexual history is being brought up.
It was a sexual crime.
Going back to the gun hypothetical: if you've never had an empty clip pointed at your head (this is very Janice Soprano and Richie Aprille) but you're shot in the head and someone's defense is 'we always did it sexually! It was an accident' then the route of murder is a likely and possible one and worth pursuit.
However if it can be established that yes, you indeed have regular sex with a gun pointed to your head – and had done it with previous partners – and again borrowing from The Sopranos, and you 'usually take the clip out,' then manslaughter is the route.
I think people are probably just imagining their own sexual history on display for their family and the world to see.