Thanks for explaining, I am in the U.S. and suppression of an adult defendant's name is pretty much unthinkable here. Of course there is the presumption of innocence but it never extends to masking the identity of the defendant or even someone who is arrested but not charged. But if this guy is convicted there will be no doubt this suppression is lifted, corrected?
I would certainly think so the only time I can recall suppression continuing after conviction is in sexual assault cases or cases involving violence towards children - in those scenarios to protect the identity of the children.Thanks for explaining, I am in the U.S. and suppression of an adult defendant's name is pretty much unthinkable here. Of course there is the presumption of innocence but it never extends to masking the identity of the defendant or even someone who is arrested but not charged. But if this guy is convicted there will be no doubt this suppression is lifted, corrected?
No doubt she had worked out immediately, that a 26 yr/o in such a senior role, wouldn't in all likelihood be living in downtown Auckland, in transitory accommodation, dating backpackers for short term flings.
I would certainly think so the only time I can recall suppression continuing after conviction is in sexual assault cases or cases involving violence towards children - in those scenarios to protect the identity of the children.
Yeah I was wondering if he was gainfully employed at this time last year.I've wondered if the guy is some kind of trustafarian
Living in a Citylife apartment doesn't come cheap, and it doesn't appear that he had a job
Yeah I was wondering if he was gainfully employed at this time last year.
It crossed my mind that maybe he was going through her purse to steal cash or other valuables.
The hotel room isn’t as impressive as I was picturing especially for ones primary residence but I suppose the location is the thing.
Right, how convenient is it if throttling someone (let's face it, pretty much always a female someone) to death is now classified as accidental side effect of consensual sex, for which the male should not be held to account for or even, according to this guy's attorney, feel too bad about?
His actions with photographing her corpse and hopping right back on Tinder are beyond sinister. Even more sinister than disposing of the body IMO.
Speaking of Tinder was there anything in court about the timing of their Tinder connection or communications before they met up on Dec 1?
Lots of these killers act up to their first murder
It reminds me a bit of the Jo Yeates case
I think he fancied himself as some sort of self-styled player rather than the carefree single oil manager on the prowl. The stylish image he employed was just there to impress and falsely woo as many women into bed as he could.
From what I've read from other folks that have met him. He comes across as a fake, unlikeable, loser that suffers from delusions of grandeur and reality.
Taken from Tortoise link above...
The Defence, however, says the jury shouldn't place undue weight on the accused's actions after the death, as that wouldn't help them decide what happened in the hotel room.
I find that odd, it would have a huge bearing for me as a juror.
Blood in hotel room at centre of Grace Millane murder trial