He says the truth is the primary obligation is to their client. That nothing was suggested, and that he framed his questions with the fact that whatever she did WAS within the law. And Hinckley also points out that there were no objections at the time. Barth says it misrepresented the public defender's office obligation. That when there is a moment of tension between obligation to client and to law, that it defaults to client and that would be a misrepresentation.
by Jen Crompton/WMUR 7:17 AM
Read more:
http://livewire.wmur.com/Event/State_vs_Mazzaglia#ixzz35ZAVIma0