NH NH - Elizabeth Marriott, 19, Durham, 9 Oct 2012 - # 9 *S. Mazzaglia guilty*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh: I know it! They didn't have to go any further than the vest! The guy with the vest.

Every single witness! "Yes, I see him. He's over there, wearing a vest." :)
 
The State objected to the defense just now turning this over to the State, at this late date so to speak. The defense throws up motions to dismiss in every trial I have followed and I didn't see the State upset with the lateness of the material being supplied to it.

True, the motion to dismiss is generally in response to something that happened in court at that time, hard to plan for. In this case, it seems to be that Barth wished he hadn't put one of his office staff on as a witness. That was a first!

Rmember when HLN had their news reporter called as a witness in the Jodi Arias trial? That was so ridiculous, and of course she wore the shortest skirt she could find.
 
so over the last two days i've discovered why some animals in the wild eat their young :anguish: :floorlaugh: j/k, it's been nuts here at the hive

morning sleuthy friends...........i'm so far behind i think i see myself coming and going (oh look there i go)...........so i'm reading like a mad woman.....and hopefully will be caught up soon........:findinglink:

so anxious to see your input about the defense case......omg please :please: don't let this monster walk:furious:

:crush:love you guys, see you soon :heartbeat:
 
Every single witness! "Yes, I see him. He's over there, wearing a vest." :)

But don't they usually go on to say..." and the white shirt with the strip-ped tie!" They can stop at the vest, no one else would wear that! :floorlaugh:
 
Remember earlier when the Prosecution asked for a mistrial? I am wondering if a mistrial is something that would benefit the state and how?

Can you recall why? I know it had to do with Barth's opening statement but I don't remember what Barth said that caused the state to want a mistrial.
 
True, the motion to dismiss is generally in response to something that happened in court at that time, hard to plan for. In this case, it seems to be that Barth wished he hadn't put one of his office staff on as a witness. That was a first!

Rmember when HLN had their news reporter called as a witness in the Jodi Arias trial? That was so ridiculous, and of course she wore the shortest skirt she could find.

Oh yeah! She was ready for her 15 minutes :floorlaugh:
 
Shocking. Motion to dismiss denied.
 
Someone is going crazy with the scribbling. Usually I just hear a "check!" as the defense asks a question.
 
we didn't get the judge's ruling on live stream?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
178
Guests online
612
Total visitors
790

Forum statistics

Threads
608,306
Messages
18,237,562
Members
234,338
Latest member
Nicolemc71
Back
Top