CuriousHousewife
Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 629
- Reaction score
- 11
And why would a perp, intent upon taking her, leave the flashers on to draw attention? Flashers are meant to draw attention, the last thing most criminals are looking for IMHO. If he was ripping her out of the car don't you think he could have/would have reached in and shut the flashers off? If she were in trouble she would not have stopped at this place for help and the fact that the car was running when found rules out car trouble as a reason for the flashers IMO. If it were a car jacking, why didn't they take the car? Because of the baby? If so, this will be the first carjacking in Conway. Ever. And carjackings do not usually end in a disappearance of the driver.....
I *guess* I could go with the theory that the perp didn't want to hurt the baby and hoped the baby would be found, but I only think that could be the case if the perp was the one dumping the car. That is entirely possible, but they knew where she lived, you'd think the smarter thing to do would have been to drive her car back to her house (or leave it there) and pretend like nothing happened, knowing she had roommates, knowing the baby would be found there.
It *could* have been a car-jacking and they realized baby was in the back after the fact, but usually during a car-jacking, they don't abduct the driver and hide them. Usually they either shoot them on the spot or leave them on the side of the road. The baby in the car in a parking lot makes sense with a car-jacking scenario, but the area and the rest of the clues so far don't fit.
The "car trouble" could have been that this other driver hit her car, consistent with possible car damage seen in the photos, but that's the only reason I can think of for her to stop there and would be the perfect way to get her out of the car. The question still remains why? I think a lot more will come to light when we know who the owner of the second car they are processing is.