Do we know for sure that alcohol caused both (or either) of the crashes? I know that seems to be the general consensus but I'm wondering if we know for sure. Was she arrested after the first accident? If she was charged with DUI wouldn't that have meant an automatic suspension of her driver's license? Obviously people drive without a license but I don't remember hearing that she had her license suspended or even that she was charged. I know there was supposedly a bottle of coke with some alcohol in it found in her car and that she bought alcohol on the trip but again, I guess to me that doesn't necessarily mean she was drunk at that moment. I'm not saying she wasn't. Obviously that is a reasonable possibility. I'm just trying to figure out what we know for sure and what is being deduced.
Accident 1 was in Fred's car at 2:00 am in the morning, after the "Dorm Party" (in quotes because nobody seems to want to confirm the party or the guests). If the party really did happen, then the probability that Maura drank at the party is high. So while the accident may not have been 100% caused by drinking, there was snow/ice, could have been speeding etc., it would not be good to be in an accident at that time of morning smelling of alcohol. I can't find the details now, but it seems whatever officer responded just wrote a report and let her go with tow truck driver to Fred's Hotel. I can't remember if she got a ticket or citation.
Added in Edit: I found on Renner's Blog ( no I don't particularly care for how he went about research/investigation, did not like his book True Crime Addict, and I question his motives and theories) where he states he talked to the Hadley Police Officer, who responded to Accident #1. The PO states to Renner that Maura would have been charged with "failure to control vehicle", had she not ended up missing. Renner states this is a misdemeanor. I don't know how local/state laws work in MA, so don't know if Maura would have known this when she left the accident. Also, we don't know how the PO left it with Maura and what he specifically said or indicated to her at the scene of the accident.
At this time she was on probation for the Credit Card fraud. This incident would be removed from her record if she got into no more trouble until probation was up sometime in February 2004. So I guess it depends on how "trouble" would be defined by her probation officer and the court. Also, it would depend on what the responding officer to the accident wrote in the police report.
She had the police report of the accident in the car with her when she left. Then she gets in Accident #2 in NH with open alcohol in her car and now spilled all over the car.
I do believe she would have been in a state of mind where she was concerned with her probation, Accident #1 possibly revoking her probation and ruining her chances at a career in nursing. Then Accident #2 happens and it puts her in panic mode.