Fairy1
VOTE!!!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 10,277
- Reaction score
- 3,421
To profit. No one's going to aid and abet a felony (which insurance fraud would be) unless they got a cut of the action. BUT....because SK wouldn't have anything to give until *after* the insurance came through, the partner may have been angered and threatened to expose the scheme. Argument or other harm ensues.
Ahhhh - thank you. See, I was assuming this other person would have known - going in - that there would be no immediate profit. So, it wouldn't be to their benefit to harm Steven BEFORE the $$$ came in.
Absolutely. But IF something like this took place, I doubt it involved anyone we've heard about.
I'm inclined to agree with you here. BUT, there still had to have been an initial point of contact - most likely in St. George. There doesn't seem to be an electronic trail, but the beginning of the ball of yarn MUST be there......somewhere.