Oh for crying out loud. How is he defending himself?
Meyers drove away from him to their own house. They were not after him at that point. This is getting ridiculous. You can't just follow someone to their house and shoot them, and then claim self-defense.
jjenny, I completely agree with you on this point. All of the accounts -- every last one, from every single person we've heard from -- has EN in the silver car following the Meyers in their car into their cul de sac to their house.
That fact, all by itself, makes this
not a self-defense case. Even if BM pointed his gun at EN first out at the first shooting scene. Once the threat is retreating, you don't get to follow, or chase, the person you think was threatening you, and then shoot them. It just doesn't work that way.
I think .... correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the feeling I get .... I think you're being very resistant to this theory because you're convinced EN is guilty and should be charged, tried and convicted.
FTR, I agree with you. Whatever happened prior to the shooting in the cul de sac absolutely does not justify EN shooting TM. I think he's already been charged. I hope he's convicted. (Although I'm not optimistic.)
I'm merely trying to figure out what led up to the shooting in the cul de sac, because the accounts put out publicly by the Meyers simply do not make sense.