sonjay
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2014
- Messages
- 3,608
- Reaction score
- 117
Not more. Equally. The Meyers' story is that ridiculous.
Yes, this. Exactly.
Not more. Equally. The Meyers' story is that ridiculous.
No. Please go back and read what I wrote.
Yet somehow there are many similarities between their story and what suspect told friends.
How does that work?
I read what you wrote. You are suggesting they invited someone to their home who had a loaded weapon and already shot at them. And then you are claiming that somehow makes sense. Would you invite someone to your home who shot at you multiple times?
If you were in a road rage incident and you got away from the road rager and made your way safely home, would you get your son to arm up and go back out looking for the road rager? Are you claiming that somehow makes sense?
Suspect had an illegal weapon. How can one possibly SYG with an illegal weapon he wasn't supposed to have to begin with? This is getting ridiculous.
I'm not here to express outrage or animosity either way. I like puzzles and mysteries and court room strategy. This case intrigued me for that reason. It's cut and dry that the suspect shot TM. The puzzle is the Meyers family's behavior and lies, the mystery is exactly how did it happen, and I'm interested in what type of arguments the prosecution and defense will present.I don't understand the animosity towards the victims instead of the suspect, who appears to be very far from an upstanding citizen.
EN's attorney will be on Anderson Cooper at 8 ET
.45 caliber bullets were found at the shooting scene way from the house. At the house, they found both caliber bullets. .45 and from Brandon's gun. That adds up with what Brandon told police.
I don't see many differences between story suspect told friends what Meyers told police.
Today was said....EN purchased a gun because he kept getting robbed and/or picked on. I understand his gun was registered to him.
Don't quote me...maybe someone else will have better info.
Nowsch reportedly said that he saw someone in the green pointing a gun at him -- first -- and he fired on the green car after seeing that. The Meyers don't say that.
Nowsch said the other people didn't shoot back at him. The Meyers say BM fired back, and the shell casings reportedly support that assertion.
Nowsch said the other people were kids. (as in, "I got those kids.") The Meyers say it was TM (a woman in her 40s) and BM (a man in his early 20s).
Nowsch said the incident started when someone in the green car pointed a gun at him, but the Meyers said it started when the silver car sped up toward them "aggressively" while TM was innocently driving home after giving her daughter a driving lesson.
Something happened at the shooting scene away from the house. We really, truly, honestly, do NOT know exactly what happened. We can't believe EN, and we can't believe the Meyers. We can be pretty sure EN fired his gun at that shooting scene. We cannot, at this point, know why, and we cannot know what happened immediately prior to that and we cannot know what happened immediately after that.
None of it's plausible. None of the versions of the story as put forth by any of the Meyers family is plausible.
How is the neighbor an authority on the matter? LOLHis neighbor said he wasn't licensed to have a gun.
"Ms Mours, 30, said: 'He's not licensed to have a gun, he's only 19. And I know he's had police troubles before"- See more at: http://www.coloradonewsday.com/news...-days-after-killing.html#sthash.hNFw5FqA.dpuf
I'm still trying to work out how a 45 can fire 22 shells. DH is a firearms enthusiast so I'll ask him when he gets home.
How do we know the 3 shells found at scene #1 were from that night?
There are two scenes. BN fired back at the home (second scene). Not the first scene, where the suspect fired at BN and his mother's in the car. So at the first scene BN was not shooting at the suspect. The rest of discrepancies can be easily explained. The two stories are similar.