NY - Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein arrested, sex trafficking, 6 July 2019 *FOUND DECEASED IN JAIL* #3

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
FBI examining broken cameras outside Epstein jail cell: report

FBI examining broken cameras outside Epstein jail cell: report

.....

Ok first I thought suicide, then murder, back to suicide, now- murdered.
At the end...who cares if he was killed or did off himself? He was just a pedo-scum, nothing more.
A rich pedo-scum to be more precise.
All these investigations for a living (now not living....) nothingness are just a waste of time and money :cool::confused:
 
At the end...who cares if he was killed or did off himself? He was just a pedo-scum, nothing more.
A rich pedo-scum to be more precise.
All these investigations for a living (now not living....) nothingness are just a waste of time and money :cool::confused:
Uncovering the truth of wrong doing is worth the time and money, imo.

The victims deserve it, as the does the public in general.

My opinion.
 
Uncovering the truth of wrong doing is worth the time and money, imo.

The victims deserve it, as the does the public in general.

My opinion.
Maybe you're right.
But doing so you're keeping alive his memory and all the oddities he did in his idiotic life. :cool:
Let him fall into the eternal nothingness. He deserves it :cool:
 
She has way too much money. She'll move to another country. That's my fear.

She cannot move where she wants to. Is she a US citizen?

She can move to any British colony or territory. Can she go to New Zealand or Australia without a visa?
 
Maybe you're right.
But doing so you're keeping alive his memory and all the oddities he did in his idiotic life. :cool:
Let him fall into the eternal nothingness. He deserves it :cool:

I care about the rest of the scum bags. Let them be revealed and prosecuted. Or at least get shame and derision and not be in the social circle.

Even Prince Andrew is being snubbed. Yay!
 
You can't do anything against the so called prince...I think he has diplomat immunity (which means he's not susceptible to prosecution...)
 
Jeffrey Epstein: sealed records contain names of hundreds of third parties

The unnamed people, including a man identified only as “John Doe”, will be allowed to object to the release of the documents following a painstaking review of the materials, the US district judge Loretta Preska said.

While it is not clear who is named in the records, an attorney for“John Doe” warned that the documents may contain “life-changing” disclosures against third parties not directly involved in the litigation.

The attorney, Nicholas Lewin, requested the opportunity to be heard on the matter, citing his unnamed client’s “reputational rights”.
 
"A British actress accused of being in Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle is 'distraught' over the 'shocking' allegations against her, according to her family....

Tayler was a personal assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former gal pal and alleged madam, and named in court filings as among his friends who flew on his 'Lolita Express' jet at the time he was trafficking girls."

https://nypost.com/2019/09/05/briti...eing-linked-to-jeffrey-epsteins-inner-circle/

It's impossible to believe that a personal assistant to GM didn't know what was going on, imo.
 
At the end...who cares if he was killed or did off himself? He was just a pedo-scum, nothing more.
A rich pedo-scum to be more precise.
All these investigations for a living (now not living....) nothingness are just a waste of time and money :cool::confused:



I care.

If he was murdered I want to know who did it, why was he murdered?

I want every person that helped him procure every one of the under age girls to be outed and prosecuted, and all the people that participated in having sex with under age girls including women.
 
Jeffrey Epstein: sealed records contain names of hundreds of third parties

The unnamed people, including a man identified only as “John Doe”, will be allowed to object to the release of the documents following a painstaking review of the materials, the US district judge Loretta Preska said.

While it is not clear who is named in the records, an attorney for“John Doe” warned that the documents may contain “life-changing” disclosures against third parties not directly involved in the litigation.

The attorney, Nicholas Lewin, requested the opportunity to be heard on the matter, citing his unnamed client’s “reputational rights”.



Nicholas Lewin

Nicholas J. Lewin — KRIEGER KIM & LEWIN LLP


Nick co-founded the firm after serving for more than a decade as a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Department of Justice and a senior FBI official — including as the Special Counsel to former FBI Directors Robert S. Mueller III and James B. Comey, and then as Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

.....

Jmo. Appears to be high stakes lawyer.
 
Jeffrey Epstein: sealed records contain names of hundreds of third parties

The unnamed people, including a man identified only as “John Doe”, will be allowed to object to the release of the documents following a painstaking review of the materials, the US district judge Loretta Preska said.

While it is not clear who is named in the records, an attorney for“John Doe” warned that the documents may contain “life-changing” disclosures against third parties not directly involved in the litigation.

The attorney, Nicholas Lewin, requested the opportunity to be heard on the matter, citing his unnamed client’s “reputational rights”.

Well, being revealed as someone involved in criminal activity is usually a "life-changing" event for the lower classes, too. Why should being wealthy, powerful and famous entitle someone to avoid a criminal investigation and possible prosecution?

The rules are supposed to be the same for everyone.
 
Well, being revealed as someone involved in criminal activity is usually a "life-changing" event for the lower classes, too. Why should being wealthy, powerful and famous entitle someone to avoid a criminal investigation and possible prosecution?

The rules are supposed to be the same for everyone.
Well, being revealed as someone involved in criminal activity is usually a "life-changing" event for the lower classes, too. Why should being wealthy, powerful and famous entitle someone to avoid a criminal investigation and possible prosecution?

The rules are supposed to be the same for everyone.

They are supposed to be, i agree.... but it is beginning to appear as though the wealthy and elite amongst us haven't lived in that reality for decades.

But alas, something is changing...... and i fear the revelations that are going to be triggered due to the outing of pedo Epstein. IMO the majority of peoples world views are going to be compltely squashed in the coming months and years as this all unfolds.
 
Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) on Twitter

Judge Preska lays down the roadmap from yesterday for unsealing procedures in the Epstein-related documents. * Agree on categories of documents within two weeks. * Those arguing for sealing submit briefs a week later. * Those opposing sealing must file a week after that.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-9-5_13-20-24.jpeg
    upload_2019-9-5_13-20-24.jpeg
    66.2 KB · Views: 5
While MIT has maintained that it only accepted $800,000 from Epstein, documents and sources show that he was credited with direct involvement in at least $7.5 million of donations, and gave input about how to use the funds.
How An Élite University Research Center Concealed Its Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
Why has the school been lying about it?

It's not illegal to accept a donation and they could claim that their relationship was purely about academics and that no one from MIT partied with Epstein. That could actually be believable, if true.

But that's not what their story was. MIT acknowledged only a portion of JE's donations. Why? Is it because of entanglement with the sex crimes against underage victims? Or were JE's donations tied with strings to some of his weird ideas for projects?

Quite curious about all this.

jmo
 
Well, being revealed as someone involved in criminal activity is usually a "life-changing" event for the lower classes, too. Why should being wealthy, powerful and famous entitle someone to avoid a criminal investigation and possible prosecution?

The rules are supposed to be the same for everyone.

Yes! Perfct!
 
They are supposed to be, i agree.... but it is beginning to appear as though the wealthy and elite amongst us haven't lived in that reality for decades.

But alas, something is changing...... and i fear the revelations that are going to be triggered due to the outing of pedo Epstein. IMO the majority of peoples world views are going to be compltely squashed in the coming months and years as this all unfolds.

Agree, hopefully things are changing in our criminal justice system. Let's hope the changes continue, but its going to take a lot of public pressure.

IOW, revealing more corruption and criminal activity relies on our criminal justices systems continuing to pursue new allegations and evidence. We need to rely on them to investigate further than the currently known activities of Epstein. He probably wasn't the only one pursuing this line of business.
 
Last edited:
Why has the school been lying about it?

It's not illegal to accept a donation and they could claim that their relationship was purely about academics and that no one from MIT partied with Epstein. That could actually be believable, if true.

But that's not what their story was. MIT acknowledged only a portion of JE's donations. Why? Is it because of entanglement with the sex crimes against underage victims? Or were JE's donations tied with strings to some of his weird ideas for projects?

Quite curious about all this.

jmo

Unfortunately, it sounds as though underage "models" were involved in the solicitation of donors.

"In 2015, as Epstein’s visit drew near, Cohen instructed his staff to insure that Zuckerman, if he unexpectedly arrived while Epstein was present, be kept away from the glass-walled office in which Epstein would be conducting meetings. According to Swenson, Ito had informed Cohen that Epstein “never goes into any room without his two female ‘assistants,’ ” whom he wanted to bring to the meeting at the Media Lab. Swenson objected to this, too, and it was decided that the assistants would be allowed to accompany Epstein but would wait outside the meeting room.

On the day of the visit, Swenson’s distress deepened at the sight of the young women. “They were models. Eastern European, definitely,” she told me. Among the lab’s staff, she said, “all of us women made it a point to be super nice to them. We literally had a conversation about how, on the off chance that they’re not there by choice, we could maybe help them.”

How an Élite University Research Center Concealed Its Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
1,011
Total visitors
1,078

Forum statistics

Threads
606,982
Messages
18,213,686
Members
234,016
Latest member
cheeseDreams
Back
Top