Sorry for replying only right now, been hyper busy !!
Her IUD was distributed in Europe and Canada, but not the US. In those days, Belgium and Netherlands were part of the EEC, including Italy (1957, when EEC was born). In 1983, the EEC was also composed of Denmark, Ireland, UK (1973) and Greece (1981). However, Spain and Portugal were not member at the time
our UID was found (they became members in 1986). Finland became a EU (European Union) in 1995 only, so 12 years later after our UID was found.
So, the countries we can work on are the EEC in those days :
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:European_Union_enlargement.gif.
However, does your husband's suggestion relate to ancestry or citizenship ? Because citizenship is administrative, it doesn't necessarily relates to her physical characteristics.
You're right !
Not mentionned anywhere. It's above her left eye, which is quite unusual !!
true
If I were you, I'd widen the age estimate to 25-40 years old. If we didn't identify her, we need to widen the searching path, starting with age.
Post-mortem age estimations are often inaccurate in adults, while they are more often than not very accurate in children.
True for the blue eyes, it's a definitive rule-out.
True for her height, however, keep in mind that height in MP reports are upon declaration by family members, unless LE got the medical records. And even with medical records, it can be inaccurate if the MP has never been measured nor weighted as an adult : more often than not, the doctor asks you. So, the 6cm difference between the UID and the MP is not as problematic as it seems.
On MP reports, height and weight are more often than not inaccurate for adults.
Any WS thread link about her ?